Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr;42(4):20120105. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20120105

Table 1.

A comparison of the mean CT values in different regions of interest (ROIs)

ROI WFBP MARli NMAR p-value
WFBP vs MARli WFBP vs NMAR MARli vs NMAR
ROI2 66.41 ± 72.44 58.05 ± 39.73 56.98 ± 34.34 0.172 0.123 0.862
ROI3 60.03 ± 39.48 52.23 ± 46.67 53.34 ± 22.09 0.086 0.140 0.807
ROI4 49.28 ± 23.38 49.21 ± 32.44 48.21 ± 23.09 0.983 0.752 0.769
ROI5 59.38 ± 13.37 61.19 ± 11.77 60.48 ± 8.97 0.185 0.422 0.600
ROI6 62.02 ± 11.00 61.04 ± 13.33 60.09 ± 10.22 0.473 0.159 0.488

MARli, linear interpolation metal artefact reduction; NMAR, normalized metal artefact reduction; WFBP, weighted filtered back-projection.

Data are given as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise indicated.