Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 9.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2012 Sep 4;126(15):1821–1827. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.098061

Table 3.

Difference in BMI per 10 points of the weighted GRS according to the quintiles of physical activity

Quintiles of physical activity
P for interaction
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
Women
 METs/wk 0-2.4 2.5-5.5 5.5-11.6 11.7-22.9 ≥23.0
 n 1716 1506 1491 1473 1421
 GRS (range) 16.8-41.8 14.8-42.3 16.0-40.2 13.1-42.4 17.9-43.4
 β (SE)*
 1986-1988 1.8 (0.3) 1.8 (0.3) 1.6 (0.3) 1.5 (0.3) 1.2 (0.3) 0.001
 1986-1996 2.1 (0.3) 1.7 (0.2) 1.6 (0.2) 1.3 (0.2) 1.3 (0.2) 0.001
Men
 METs/wk 0-2.7 2.8-7.6 7.7-16.2 16.3-31.3 ≥31.4
 n 918 925 885 916 900
 GRS (range) 16.6-40.6 17.1-39.9 18.3-40.8 16.9-41.9 16.0-41.3
 β (SE)*
 1986-1988 1.2 (0.3) 0.7 (0.3) 0.7 (0.3) 1.0 (0.2) 0.6 (0.3) 0.001
 1986-1996 1.5 (0.3) 0.7 (0.2) 0.8 (0.2) 1.0 (0.2) 0.5 (0.2) 0.03
Pooled β (SE) * §
 1986-1988 1.5 (0.2) 1.3 (0.2) 1.2 (0.2) 1.2 (0.2) 0.8 (0.2) <0.001
 1986-1996 1.8 (0.2) 1.2 (0.2) 1.2 (0.2) 1.1 (0.1) 0.8 (0.1) <0.001
*

Difference in BMI (kg/m2) per 10 points of the weighted GRS, adjusted for age, genotype data source, and disease status.

Data are based on first 2 year of follow-up after the assessment of physical activity in women and men (1986-1988).

Data are based on 10 years of follow-up in women and men (1986-1996, repeated measures analysis)

§

Results were pooled between women and men by inverse-variance–weighted, fixed-effects meta-analyses.