Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 20;26(3):141–148. doi: 10.3109/08941939.2012.724519

TABLE 1 .

Results of the multiple logistic regression for hemostatic effectiveness based on the odds ratio of binomial model of success percent, and for control of bleeding based on the odds ratio of proportional model of bleeding score. A 95% lower confidence limit greater than 1.0 indicates statistical significance and favors the numerator of the comparison. The greater the value above 1.0, the greater the significance

Model Minutes After application Pig effect p-value Lobe effect p-value Baseline effect p-value Comparison Odds ratio 95% lower confidence limit 95% upper confidence limit
Hemostatic effectiveness 2 .8997 .7138 .0004 FLOSEAL/SURGIFLO+Thrombin 0.9249 0.1926 4.4405
5 .0675 .2691 .0023 FLOSEAL/SURGIFLO+Thrombin 5.3247 1.5950 17.7763
10 .0176 .2100 .0124 FLOSEAL/SURGIFLO+Thrombin 4.9878 1.5489 16.0616
Control of bleeding 2 .5099 .2629 .0000 FLOSEAL/SURGIFLO+Thrombin 1.7315 0.4786 6.2642
5 .0019 .0131 .0001 FLOSEAL/SURGIFLO+Thrombin 3.3570 1.3394 8.4138
10 .0000 .3001 .0000 FLOSEAL/SURGIFLO+Thrombin 3.8653 1.6216 9.2135