Table 2.

Simulation results for Study 2; bias, standard deviation of estimates (SD), and percent coverage of nominal 95% confidence intervals (CR) of regression coefficients are compared for cumulative hazard functions estimated using the conditional intensity with those estimated using empircal rates, with and without missing data.

Parameter	True Value	Conditional (complete data)			Empirical (complete data)			Empirical (missing data)
		Bias	SD	Coverage	Bias	SD	Coverage	Bias	SD	Coverage
β0	−10.0	−0.128	0.662	96.7	−0.090	0.658	96.6	−0.090	0.659	96.3
β1	0.5	−0.003	0.096	95.1	0.012	0.095	95.2	0.011	0.095	95.2
β2	0.5	0.016	0.150	95.4	−0.050	0.149	92.2	−0.050	0.149	92.1
β3	0.5	0.005	0.099	98.6	0.044	0.099	95.8	0.044	0.099	95.8
β4	0.1	0.003	0.092	97.2	0.003	0.091	96.8	0.003	0.091	96.7
β5	0.1	−0.003	0.116	95.7	−0.002	0.115	96.8	−0.002	0.115	96.5
β6	0.0	0.002	0.109	96.3	0.001	0.108	96.9	0.001	0.108	96.8
β7	0.0	−0.014	0.104	94.8	−0.013	0.103	95.5	−0.013	0.103	95.6
β8	0.0	−0.011	0.100	94.8	−0.010	0.099	96.0	−0.010	0.099	95.7
β9	0.1	0.021	0.104	96.6	0.020	0.103	97.0	0.020	0.103	96.7
β10	0.0	−0.001	0.110	99.1	0.000	0.109	98.6	0.000	0.109	98.7
β11	0.0	0.010	0.115	97.2	0.010	0.114	97.5	0.010	0.114	97.5
β12	0.1	−0.008	0.091	98.9	−0.007	0.090	99.5	−0.007	0.090	99.6