Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 30.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Nov 3;94(3):543–550. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.029

Table 2.

Logistic regression models for CAFAS total scores with BRI and MI as predictor variables

BRI Model MI Model Combined Model



Variable Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Odds Ratio (95% CI) P
Sex 1.60 (0.618–4.15) .330 2.72 (0.94–7.93) .070   2.58 (0.87–7.69) .09
Race 1.33 (0.41–4.25) .640 2.19 (0.68–7.08) .190   2.01 (0.60–6.76) .26
SES 0.72 (0.27–1.92) .510 0.93 (0.35–2.42) .880 0.743 (0.27–2.08) .57
Injury severity 1.30 (0.50–3.40) .590 1.20 (0.46–3.14) .700   1.19 (0.45–3.18) .72
PSI 0.97 (0.94–1.00) .060 0.97 (0.94–1.00) .050   0.97 (0.94–1.00) .34
Memory 0.97 (0.93–1.01) .180 0.98 (0.94–1.02) .280   0.98 (0.94–1.02) .19
BRI 5.20 (2.00–13.54) <.001 NA NA      2.74 (0.95–7.94) .06
MI NA NA    7.31 (2.63–20.33) <.001   4.73 (1.54–14.52) <.01

Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; SES, socioeconomic status estimated by primary caregiver education.