Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 30.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Nov 3;94(3):543–550. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.029

Table 3.

Logistic regression models for CAFAS school, home, and community domain scores with BRI and MI as predictor variables

BRI Model MI Model Combined Model



Domain Variable Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Odds Ratio (95% CI) P
School Sex 2.44 (1.04–5.73) .04 3.42 (1.34–8.72) .01 3.39 (1.31–8.76) .01
Race 0.74 (0.26–2.10) .57 1.06 (0.38–2.96) .92 0.93 (0.32–2.68) .89
SES 1.69 (0.71–4.02) .23 2.22 (0.94–5.22) .07 1.81 (0.74–4.41) .19
Injury severity 1.32 (0.55–3.17) .53 1.18 (0.50–2.77) .71 1.28 (0.53–3.08) .58
PSI 1.01 (0.98–1.03) .70 1.01 (0.98–1.04) .62 1.01 (0.98–1.04) .64
Memory 1.01 (0.98–1.05) .44 1.02 (0.99–1.06) .21 1.02 (0.98–1.06) .25
BRI 3.50 (1.41–8.69) <.01 NA NA 2.15 (0.78–5.93) .14
MI NA NA 3.93 (1.58–9.79) <.01 2.96 (1.06–8.30) .04
Home Sex 1.84 (0.77–4.37) .17 2.25 (0.91–5.56) .08 2.16 (0.87–5.37) .10
Race 1.03 (0.34–3.14) .97 1.25 (0.41–3.84) .69 1.14 (0.37–3.56) .82
SES 1.30 (0.52–3.21) .57 1.46 (0.59–3.57) .41 1.33 (0.53–3.31) .55
Injury severity 1.18 (0.47–2.95) .72 1.22 (0.49–3.04) .67 1.18 (0.47–2.98) .73
PSI 0.97 (0.95–1.00) .07 0.97 (0.94–1.00) .05 0.97 (0.95–1.00) .07
Memory 1.03 (0.99–1.07) .11 1.03 (0.99–1.07) .10 1.04 (1.00–1.08) .08
BRI 3.08 (1.05–9.02) .04 NA NA 2.20 (0.66–7.28) .20
MI NA NA 2.86 (1.07–7.67) .04 1.96 (0.65–5.93) .23
Community Sex 2.47 (0.53–11.47) .25 8.16 (1.21–55.23) .03 7.35 (1.08–50.26) .04
Race* NA NA NA NA NA NA
SES 0.75 (0.16–3.41) .70 1.18 (0.26–5.28) .83 1.03 (0.21–4.96) .98
Injury severity 0.54 (0.13–2.31) .41 0.47 (0.11–2.08) .32 0.52 (0.11–2.35) .39
PSI 1.02 (0.97–1.07) .52 1.03 (0.98–1.08) .33 1.02 (0.974–1.08) .36
Memory 1.05 (0.98–1.12) .21 1.07 (1.00–1.15) .06 1.07 (0.99–1.12) .07
BRI 5.38 (1.34–21.64) .02 NA NA 1.68 (0.33–8.57) .53
MI NA NA 17.53 (3.06–100.56) <.01 13.28 (1.94–90.87) <.01

Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; SES, socioeconomic status estimated by primary caregiver education.

*

Race was not used as a covariate in the community analysis, because the maximum likelihood ratio did not exist for this variable because of the small percentage (9.1%) of individuals with community impairment on the CAFAS in the study population.