Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Jan 8;37(6):905–913. doi: 10.1111/acer.12058

Table 4.

Goodness-of-Fit Results from TwinModels for Univariate Models of Mastery and Alcohol Dependence

Model Compared
with model
df Δ χ 2 p AIC
Mastery
1 General sex-
limitation ACE
6642 7850.86
2 Common sex-
limitation ACE
1 6643 0.17 0.68 7849.03
3 No sex-
limitation
ACE
2 6646 0.16 0.98 7843.19
4 No sex-
limitation AE
3 6647 0.00 1.00 7841.19
5 No sex-
limitation
E
3 6648 122.25 <0.001 7961.44
Alcohol dependence
1 General sex-
limitation ACE
6648 −7103.44
2 Common sex-limitation
ACE
1 6649 0.004 0.95 −7105.44
3 No sex-
limitation
ACE
2 6652 1.05 0.79 −7110.38
4 No sex-
limitation
AE
3 6653 0.00 1.00 −7112.38
5 No sex-
limitation
E
3 6650 116.10 <0.001 −6998.28

Mastery was a 5-category ordinal variable. Model descriptors correspond to additive genetic (A), common environmental (C), and unique environmental (E) influences. Results for the best-fitting models are shown in bold.