Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun;182(6):2180–2190. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.02.022

Table 1.

Instances in Which All Three Donors Had >1.8-Fold Differences in MC Activity with or without PCM Priming

MC activity Culture time (hours) Biomaterial surface PCM priming (+/−) Donor 1 Donor 2 Donor 3
Viable adherent MCs/mm2 170 PEG hydrogel 207 241 82
170 PEG hydrogel + 888 1058 235
Fold-change with PCM priming 4.3 4.4 2.9
170 PDMS 116 90 16
170 PDMS + 222 217 80
Fold-change with PCM priming 1.9 2.4 4.9
Total (viable and necrotic) adherent MCs/mm2 170 PEG hydrogel 226 272 103
170 PEG hydrogel + 950 1111 270
Fold-change with PCM priming 4.2 4.1 2.6
IL-1β (pg/mL) 98 PDMS 20 18 18
98 PDMS + 51 60 56
Fold-change with PCM priming 2.5 3.3 3.1
TNF-α (pg/mL) 98 PDMS 62 37 9
98 PDMS + 173 218 17
Fold-change with PCM priming 2.8 5.9 1.8

P = 0.01 to P = 0.05, significant difference in the mean of the three donors with PCM priming based on one-way analysis of variance combined with Bonferroni's multiple comparison post tests.

There were also >1.8-fold increases in IL-1β expression with PCM priming in MC cultures on PEG hydrogels and PDMS at 170 hours, but because some of the IL-1β values were extrapolated below the standard curve at 170 hours, these increases in IL-1β expression with PCM priming were not included in the table.