Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun;182(6):2180–2190. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.02.022

Table 2.

Instances in Which All Three Donors Had >1.8-Fold Differences in Cell Activity between the PMN-MC Direct Co-Culture and the Sum of PMN and MC Monocultures

Cell activity Culture time (hours) Biomaterial surface Direct co-culture (PMN-MC) or sum of PMN and MC monocultures (PMN + MC) Donor 1 Donor 2 Donor 3
Viable adherent cells/mm2 48 PDMS PMN + MC 412 48 185
48 PDMS PMN-MC 833 116 340
Fold-change with direct co-culture (PMN-MC) 2.0 2.4 1.8
48 TCPS PMN + MC 187 88 66
48 TCPS PMN-MC 349 173 270
Fold-change with direct co-culture (PMN-MC) 1.9 2.0 4.1
168 PEG hydrogel PMN + MC 44 46 41
168 PEG hydrogel PMN-MC 22 3 22
Fold-change with direct co-culture (PMN-MC) 0.50 0.06 0.53
IL-6 (pg/mL) 48 TCPS PMN + MC 14 797 146
48 TCPS PMN-MC 7 44 78
Fold-change with direct co-culture (PMN-MC) 0.47 0.06 0.54
IL-8 (pg/mL) 168 TCPS PMN + MC 795 897 353
168 TCPS PMN-MC 1436 2253 919
Fold-change with direct co-culture (PMN-MC) 1.8 2.5 2.6

There were also >1.8-fold decreases in IL-6 expression between the PMN-MC direct co-culture and the sum of the PMN and MC monocultures on TCPS at 96 hours, but because some of the IL-6 values were extrapolated below the standard curve at 96 hours, these decreases in IL-6 expression were not included in this table.