Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 24;162(2):626–639. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.216820

Table I. Total lipid content (% of dry weight) of homozygous transgenic and control leaves harvested 14, 21, and 35 DAS.

Values represent means ± sd from separate analyses (n = 6). Parentheses show P values for statistical significance between the transgenic line and the wild type calculated by Student’s two-tailed t test. N/A, Not available; ns, not significant.

Construct Plant Age
14 DAS 21 DAS 35 DAS
Wild type 5.0 ± 0.3 3.8 ± 0.05 3.7 ± 0.2
Vector control 4.8 ± 0.2 (ns) 4.0 ± 0.1 (P = 0.0429) 3.9 ± 0.1 (P = 0.0231)
D1 4.8 ± 0.2 (ns) 3.8 ± 0.02 (ns) 3.7 ± 0.01 (ns)
D1o0-0 5.3 ± 0.1 (P = 0.0319) 3.8 ± 0.05 (ns) 4.0 ± 0.03 (P = 0.0019)
D1o1-1 5.1 ± 0.1 (ns) 4.1 ± 0.1 (P = 0.0004) 3.7 ± 0.2 (ns)
D1o1-3 5.5 ± 0.1 (P = 0.0013) 4.3 ± 0.3 (P = 0.0016) 4.1 ± 0.03 (P = 0.0002)
D1o3-1 5.9 ± 0.2 (P = 0.0001) 4.3 ± 0.2 (P = 2.7E-05) 4.3 ± 0.2 (P = 0.0003)
D1o3-3 6.7 ± 0.1 (P = 5.3E-08) 6.8 ± 0.1 (P = 5.6E-13) 7.0 ± 0.2 (P = 1.5E-11)
D1o5-6 N/A N/A 4.5 ± 0.02 (P = 3.4E-07)
D1o6-7 N/A N/A 4.5 ± 0.08 (P = 1.1E-06)