Table 2.
Endpoints and results among fluocinolone device studies for the treatment of diabetic macular edema
| Author | Eyes | Endpoints | Results | 
|---|---|---|---|
| FAc implant | |||
| Bausch and Lomb55 | 80 eyes (1:1 to 0.5 mg FAc or SOC) | Retinal thickening after 6 mo | FAc significantly better (P = 0.03) | 
| Improvement in severity of DR after 6 mo | FAc significantly better (P = 0.01) | ||
| Improvement or stable VA after 6 mo | 80% in treatment group vs 50% in SOC (P < 0.01) | ||
| Pearson et al57 | 197 eyes (2:1 to 0.59 mg FAc or SOC) | Visual acuity gain of ≥three lines | 28% in FAc vs 15% in SOC at 3 yrs (P < 0.05) | 
| Visual acuity loss of ≥three lines | 19% in FAc vs 16% in SOC at 3 yrs (NS) | ||
| Resolution of edema at center of macula | 58% in FAc vs 30% SOC at 3 yrs (P < 0.001) | ||
| Improvement in diabetic retinopathy scores | 13% in FAc vs 4% SOC at 3 yrs (P < 0.001) | ||
| Pearson et al56 | 196 eyes (2:1 0.59 mg FAc or SOC) | Visual acuity gain of ≥15 letters | FAc significantly better until 1 yr | 
| Improvement in macular edema | FAc significantly better until 2 yrs | ||
| ETDRS diabetic retinopathy severity scale | FAc improved faster, declined slower | ||
| Leakage by FA | FAc significantly better until 2 yrs | ||
| Maximum cystoid score | FAc significantly better until 1 yr | ||
| FAc insert | |||
| Campochiaro et al58 | 37 eyes (2:1 0.2 μg/day, 0.59 μg/day) | Change in BCVA at month 12 | 1.3 letters (low dose), 5.7 letters (high dose) | 
| Campochiaro et al60 | 956 eyes (2:2:1 0.2 μg/day, 0.5 μg/day, or sham) | ≥15-letter increase in VA | FAc group better through 3 years | 
| Mean improvement VA from baseline | FAc groups better through 3 years | ||
| Decreased retinal thickness | FAc groups better through 2 years | ||
Abbreviations: BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; DR, diabetic retinopathy; ETDRS, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; FA, fluorescein angiography; FAc, fluocinolone acetonide; SOC, standard of care; VA, visual acuity; NS, not significant.