. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 31.

Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Mar;92(3):464–471. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.028

Table 3.

Multilevel Models Estimating Community Effects on Long-term Rehabilitation Outcomes^‡

Model	Ill Health^*	Dissatisfaction With Life^†	Depressive Disorder^†‡
Model I: model
Intercept (γ₀₀)	0.45 (0.38–0.54)^§	0.69 (0.58–0.81)^∥	0.28 (0.24–0.32)^∥
Between-community variation (τ₀₀)	0.18^§	0.14^§	0.00
Model II: community SES effects
Intercept (γ₀₀)	0.48 (0.40–0.58)^∥	0.62 (0.53–0.72)^∥	0.28 (0.24–0.32)^∥
Community SES (γ₀₁)	0.96 (0.93–0.99)^¶	1.05 (1.02–1.08)^§	1.00 (0.97–1.04)
Between-community variation (τ₀₀)	0.12^¶	0.07^#	0.00
Model III: percent urban effects
Intercept (γ₀₀)	0.48 (0.39–0.59)^∥	0.57 (0.48–0.67)^∥	0.29 (0.24–0.35)^∥
Urban composition (γ₀₁)	0.69 (0.40–1.19)	2.74 (1.74–4.31)^∥	0.99 (0.59–1.66)
Between-community variation (τ₀₀)	0.17^¶	0.07^#	0.00

NOTE. Values expressed as odds ratio (confidence interval).

Abbreviations: γ₀₀, random intercept; γ₀₁, risk for each outcome.

Omitted reference group is good health.

^†

Omitted reference group is nodisord with life.

^‡

Omitted reference group is no disorder.

^§

P<.01

^∥

P<.001

^¶

P<.05

P<.10.