Table 3.

Mixed-language ANOVA results.

Measure	Effect	F1			F2
		Test	p	${\eta }_p^2$	Test	p	${\eta }_p^2$
Naming Latency	Cognate status	F(1,26) = 7.53*	<0.05	0.22	F(1,252) = 8.69*	<0.05	0.03
	Switching	F(1,26) = 2.40	>0.05	0.09	F(1,252) = 1.79	>0.05	0.01
	Language	F(1,26) < 1	>0.05	<0.01	F(1,252) < 1	>0.05	0.01
	Switching × language	F(1,26) < 1	>0.05	<0.01	F(1,252) < 1	>0.05	0.01
	Switching × cognate status	F(1,26) < 1	>0.05	<0.01	F(1,252) < 1	>0.05	<0.01
	Language × cognate status	F(1,26) = 1.27	>0.05	0.05	F(1,252) = 1.06	>0.05	<0.01
	Switching × language × cognate status	F(1,26) < 1	>0.05	<0.01	F(1,252) < 1	>0.05	<0.01
Accuracy	Cognate status	F(1,26) = 6.57*	<0.05	0.202	F(1,252) = 2.43	>0.05	0.01
	Switching	F(1,26) < 1	>0.05	0.02	F(1,252) < 1	>0.05	<0.01
	Language	F(1,26) = 3.19	>0.05	0.11	F(1,252) = 3.07	>0.05	0.01
	Switching × language	F(1,26) < 1	>0.05	0.03	F(1,252) < 1	>0.05	<0.01
	Switching × cognate status	F(1,26) = 1.42	>0.05	0.05	F(1,252) < 1	>0.05	<0.01
	Language × cognate status	F(1,26) = 3.44	>0.05	0.12	F(1,252) < 1	>0.05	<0.01
	Switching × language × cognate status	F(1,26) = 2.78	>0.05	0.1	F(1,252) = 1.84	>0.05	<0.01

Results of 2 × 2 × 2 repeated measures ANOVAs on naming latency and accuracy for Experiment 1.