Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 11;108(8):1571–1578. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.145

Table 1. Baseline characteristicsa.

 
Axitinib
Sorafenib
Variable n=361 n=362
Age, years, median (range)
61 (20–82)
61 (22–80)
Gender
Male 265 (73) 258 (71)
Female
96 (27)
104 (29)
Race
White 278 (77) 269 (74)
Black 1 (<1) 4 (1)
Asian 77 (21) 81 (22)
Other
5 (1)
8 (2)
ECOG performance status
0 195 (54) 200 (55)
1 162 (45) 160 (44)
>1
1 (<1)b
0
MSKCC risk groupc (Motzer et al, 2004)
0 (favourable) 100 (28) 101 (28)
1–2 (intermediate) 134 (37) 130 (36)
⩾3 (poor) 118 (33) 120 (33)
NA
9 (2.5)
11 (3.0)
Heng et al risk factors (Heng et al, 2009)
0 (favourable) 66 (18) 79 (22)
1–2 (intermediate) 236 (65) 225 (62)
⩾3 (poor) 37 (10) 34 (9)
N/A
22 (6)
24 (7)
Prior systemic therapy
Sunitinib 194 (54) 195 (54)
Cytokines 126 (35) 125 (35)
Bevacizumab 29 (8) 30 (8)
Temsirolimus
12 (3)
12 (3)
Baseline FKSI-15 score
N 346 342
Observed mean (s.d.)
43.20 (8.42)
43.34 (8.16)
Baseline FKSI-DRS score
N 346 341
Observed mean (s.d.) 28.87 (5.19) 28.98 (5.19)

Abbreviations: ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FKSI=Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index; FKSI-DRS=Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-Disease-Related Symptoms; MSKCC=Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; s.d.=standard deviation.

a

Values are n (%) unless otherwise noted.

b

Protocol violation.

c

MSKCC risk groups were derived using three risk factors: haemoglobin (⩽13 vs >13 g dl−1 for males and ⩽11.5 vs >11.5 g dl−1 for females), ‘corrected' calcium (<10 vs ⩾10 mg dl−1) and ECOG performance status (0 vs 1). Risk groups were defined as favourable (0 factors), intermediate (1 factor), or poor (2–3 factors).