Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 31.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Feb;60(2):258–261. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.60.2.258

Table 1.

Intervention Effects on 9 year Stigma Concern Variables*

Meds vs. UC Therapy vs. UC Meds vs Therapy Difference Across Groups
Dependent Variable** Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Odds Ratio (95% CI) p2 Odds Ratio (95% CI) p3 F(2,41) P
Difficulty getting a job due to depression 1.33 (.87,2.02) .186 1.04 (.67,1.62) .843 1.27 (.86,1.88) .242 1.12 .335
Difficulty getting a new insurance plan due to depression 1.20 (.85,1.71) .290 .82 (.58,1.16) .248 1.47 (1.09,1.99) .016 3.19 .052
Relationship suffer due to depression 1.02 (.75,1.38) .919 .66 (.48,.90) .011 1.54 (1.10,2.17) .017 4.22 .022
Difficulty getting a job due to visiting a psychiatrist 1.27 (.83,1.94) .261 1.15 (.79,1.69) .455 1.10 (.72,1.68) .656 .69 .506
Difficulty getting a new insurance plan due to visiting a psychiatrist 1.68 (1.13,2.51) .012 1.19 (.81,1.74) .375 1.42 (1.03,1.96) .040 3.96 .027
Relationship suffer due to visiting a psychiatrist 1.27 (.82,1.98) .275 .83 (.55,1.25) .357 1.54 (.95,2.50) .089 1.52 .231
*

Sample of 805 who were completed 9-year follow-up. Logistic regression adjusted for baseline sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, marital status, education level, assets), clinic measures (chronic condition, anxiety, depression status, MCS12, and PCS12), and study sites. Model adjusted for clustering effects at clinic level using the bias reduced linearization method.

**

Dichotomized variable: 1=high concern (a lot or some), 0=low concern (a little or no).