Skip to main content
. 2013 May 20;7:419–434. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S44646

Appendix.

Study protocol listing the eligibility criteria for inclusion/exclusion of studies in the review as per the PRISMA guidelines

Clinical effectiveness Rationale
Inclusion criteria Population The population of interest to the review includes patients of any age, race, and gender receiving any oral medication for any chronic disease
• Age: Adults (≥ 18 years)
• Gender: Any
• Race: Any
• Qualifying event/disease/factors: Any chronic disease
Intervention The review aimed to compare adherence/compliance/ persistence associated with different dosing regimens rather than any particular intervention
• Any oral intervention administered as OD, BID, TID, QID
Comparator The comparator of interest was a different dosage regimen of the interventions being evaluated in the study. Since the review required direct evidence on adherence of dosing regimens of interventions, placebo/best supportive care (BSC) as comparators were not included
• Any oral intervention administered as OD, BID, TID, QID
Study design Observational studies and economic evidence were the best source of adherence/compliance data as they reflect ‘real life’ and were considered for the review.
• Comparative cohort studies/longitudinal studies (retrospective)
• Comparative cohort studies/longitudinal studies (prospective)
• Published database analyses/registries
• Case-control studies
• Cross-sectional study—comparative
• Randomized controlled trials
• Non-randomized controlled trials
• Economic studies
Language restrictions Studies with the full-text publication in English only were included in this review
• English only
Publication timeframe No date restriction was applied in order to capture the maximum amount of adherence data
• No date restriction for database searches
Exclusion criteria Outcome of interest Only studies reporting data pertaining to adherence/ compliance/persistence and healthcare costs associated with non-adherence were included in the review
• Studies that did not report the outcomes of interest (adherence/ compliance/persistence and healthcare costs associated with non-adherence) were excluded from the review
Route of administration Studies assessing interventions administered only through an oral route were included in the current review
• Studies evaluating interventions administered via a non-oral route were excluded

Abbreviations: BID, twice daily; BSC, best supportive care; OD, once daily; QID, four times daily; TID, three times daily.