Table 3. Comparison of two pairwise strategies, MAX and BMA, on estimating the functional conservation between human-mouse orthologs using Z-score analysis.
Including IEA | Excluding IEA | |||||
BP | CC | MF | BP | CC | MF | |
HRSS | 815.28 | 136.27 | 345.35 | 329.13 | 47.26 | 180.37 |
Resnik | 94.43 | 57.75 | 67.31 | 51.75 | 6.03 | 37.55 |
Jiang | 250.30 | 105.12 | 145.45 | 196.93 | 55.78 | 62.00 |
Lin | 160.04 | 92.19 | 124.88 | 106.04 | 50.85 | 49.37 |
RSS | 99.84 | 52.58 | 93.95 | 42.95 | 22.01 | 37.65 |
The difference between the two approaches was measured by the Z-score of the BMA approach minus the Z-score of MAX. This table showed a higher functional conservation of human-mouse orthologs statistically using the BMA approach.