Skip to main content
. 2013 May 31;8(5):e65337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065337

Table 3. Comparison of HIV-1 genotype distributions among IDUs in Dehong and Myanmar.

Year of sampling Region of sampling Number of samples Genome regions analyzed Genotype P-value
B′/C B′ C Other*
Present Study 2005–2009 Dehong 91 pol 75 (82.4) 5 (5.5) 5(5.5) 6 (6.6) -
Pang etal. [20] 2009 Northern Myanmar 79 gag p17, pol, vif-env C2V3 37(46.8) 3(3.8) 6(7.6) 33(41.8) <0.001
Takebe.etal. [27] 1999–2000 Central Myanmar 21 gag p17,envC2/V3 2(9.5) 7(33.3) 4(19.0) 8(38.1) <0.001
Qiu. etal. [15] 1996–1998 Dehong 54 env C2V3,near-full-length sequences 4(7.4) 49 (90.7) 1(1.9) 0 <0.001
Yang. etal. [11] 2000–2001 Dehong 14 gag-RTenv C2V3 9(64.3) 4 (28.6) 0 1 (7.1) 0.032
Zhang. et al. [16] 2003 Dehong 13 gag p17 and RT 8(61.5) 2 (15.4) 0 3 (23.1) 0.087
*

The “other” category is used to group subjects with more rare genotypes including B′/C/CRF01_AE and C/CRF01_AE recombinants and pure CRF01_AE.

Statistical significance of the distribution of genotypes between previous study and present study was determined by Fisher's exact test.