Exhibit 2. Predicted Probabilities And Relative Risk Of Insurance Status Among Lesbians Compared To Heterosexuals, Nonelderly Women Ages 18–64 In California, Average Of Years 2001, 2003, And 2005.

	Entire population				Employed population
	All women		Partnered/married women		All women		Partnered/married women
	Lesbians/heterosexuals (PP, %)	Lesbians compared to heterosexuals (RR)	Lesbians/heterosexuals (PP, %)	Lesbians compared to heterosexuals (RR)	Lesbians/heterosexuals (PP, %)	Lesbians compared to heterosexuals (RR)	Lesbians/heterosexuals (PP, %)	Lesbians compared to heterosexuals (RR)
Sample size		63,719		33,930		36,344		17,938
HEALTH INSURANCE STATUS
Uninsured	18/14	1.39**	17/11	2.11**	15/10	1.59	12/7	2.23
Public insurance	13/14	0.95	14/8	2.37	5/8	0.72**	6/5	1.78
Own ESI	41/41	0.98	47/36	1.36**	59/60	0.97	70/55	1.32**
Dependent ESI	21/23	0.9	12/37	0.28**	17/17	0.98	8/30	0.23**
Privately purchased	7/8	0.82	10/8	1.11	3/4	0.71	3/4	0.73

Source: California Health Interview Surveys, 2001, 2003, and 2005.

Notes: We bootstrapped 95 percent confidence intervals (available in the full version of this exhibit in Appendix D, which can be accessed by clicking on the Appendix link in the box to the right of the article online), by sampling stratum. Relative risks (RR) were computed from multinomial logit models that adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, language of interview, education, income as percentage of federal poverty level, minor children in household, town/rural residence, employment status/work hours, working for a firm with more than 100 employees, industry (in employed group), citizenship, and survey year. Employed group excludes self-employed. Samples include bisexuals. PP is predicted probability. ESI is employer-sponsored insurance.

^**p < 0:05