Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2011 Oct 23;25(16):10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834b6480. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834b6480

Table 3.

Predictors of loss to follow-up, mortality and viral load rebound by down-referral status and amongst HIV treatment patients in Johannesburg, South Africa (n=2,772)

No.
Events
(%)
Person
Time
(years)
Rate (per
100 person
yrs.)
Adjusted
HR
(95% CI)
No.
Events
(%)
Person
Time
(years)
Rate (per
100 person
yrs.)
Adjusted
HR
(95% CI)
No. Events
(%)
Adjusted RR§
(95% CI)

Mortality£ Loss to follow-up¥ Viral load rebound
Down referral status
  Not down-referred 32 (1.5) 2025.6 1.6 Reference 87 (4.2) 2025.6 4.3 Reference 100 (5.6) Reference
  Down-referred 2 (0.3) 687.7 0.3 0.2 (0.04-0.8) 10 (1.4) 687.7 1.5 0.3 (0.2-0.6) 22 (3.3) 0.6 (0.4-0.9)
Gender
  Female 21 (1.2) 1787.6 1.2 Reference 69 (3.8) 1787.6 3.9 Reference 74 (4.6) Reference
  Male 13 (1.4) 931.8 1.4 1.1 (0.5-2.3) 28 (2.9) 931.8 3.0 0.8 (0.5-1.3) 48 (5.7) 1.3 (0.9-1.9)
Age (years)
  ≥50 6 (2.8) 209.6 2.9 Reference 5 (2.3) 209.6 2.4 Reference 5 (2.6) Reference
  40-49.9 10 (1.6) 613.9 1.6 0.6 (0.2-1.6) 14 (2.2) 613.9 2.3 0.9 (0.3-2.3) 25 (4.6) 1.9 (0.7-4.9)
  30-39.9 11 (0.8) 1306.6 0.8 0.3 (0.1-0.9) 43 (3.2) 1306.6 3.3 1.3 (0.5-3.0) 57 (4.7) 1.9 (0.8-4.7)
  25-29.9 6 (1.4) 429.5 1.4 0.6 (0.2-1.8) 22 (5.0) 429.5 5.1 1.9 (0.8-4.7) 27 (7.2) 3.1 (1.2-8.0)
  18-24.9 1 (0.7) 148.2 0.7 0.3 (0.04-3.0) 12 (7.8) 148.2 8.1 3.1 (1.1-8.6) 8 (6.0) 2.6 (0.8-8.2)
CD4 count
   ≥500 cells/mm3 8 (1.1) 708.4 1.1 Reference 19 (2.6) 708.4 2.7 Reference 24 (3.7) Reference
  400-499 cells/mm3 4 (0.7) 557.4 0.7 0.7 (0.2-2.2) 21 (3.7) 557.4 3.8 1.4 (0.7-2.5) 25 (5.0) 1.3 (0.7-2.2)
  300-399 cells/mm3 12 (1.3) 875.3 1.4 1.1 (0.5-2.8) 35 (3.9) 875.3 4.0 1.6 (0.9-2.8) 38 (4.8) 1.3 (0.8-2.1)
  200-299 cells/mm3 10 (1.7) 572.2 1.7 1.5 (0.6-3.8) 22 (3.8) 572.2 3.8 1.5 (0.8-2.9) 35 (6.8) 1.7 (1.0-2.9)
AZT- vs. d4T-based regimen at down-referral eligibility
  AZT 11 (1.4) 801.9 1.4 Reference 21 (2.6) 801.9 2.6 Reference 26 (3.6) Reference
  d4T 23 (1.2) 1911.5 1.2 0.8 (0.4-1.8) 76 (3.9) 1911.5 4.0 1.4 (0.8-2.2) 96 (5.6) 1.4 (0.9-2.1)
NVP- vs. EFV-based regimen at down-referral eligibility
  EFV 32 (1.3) 2485.5 1.3 Reference 89 (3.5) 2485.5 3.6 Reference 110 (4.9) Reference
  NVP 2 (0.9) 219.9 1.0 0.9 (0.2-3.9) 8 (3.6) 219.9 3.6 0.8 (0.4-1.7) 12 (6.0) 1.2 (0.7-2.2)
Valid South African national identification number
  No 6 (0.8) 720.0 0.8 Reference 34 (4.6) 720.0 4.7 Reference 36 (5.6) Reference
  Yes 28 (1.4) 1993.3 1.4 1.6 (0.7-3.9) 63 (3.1) 1993.3 3.2 0.7 (0.5-1.1) 86 (4.8) 0.9 (0.6-1.3)

Hazard ratios (HR) are from a Cox proportional regression models

§

Relative risks (RR) are from log-linear regression models

¥

Loss to follow-up was defined as >4 months since last visit

£

Deaths are reported to the clinic by the hospital or the patients family notifying the clinic staff, the counselors identify the death through active tracing or through linkage with the South African National Vital Registration Infrastructure Initiative for those loss to follow-up

Viral load rebound was defined as having an unsuppressed viral load at 12-months after being suppressed at down-referral eligibility

All variables adjusted for in the models are listed in the table

CI, confidence interval; AZT, zidovudine; d4T, stavudine; NVP, nevirapine; EFV, lamivudine