Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mutat Res. 2013 Mar 13;0:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2013.03.001

Table 2.

Base substitution and insertion/deletion error rates of pol η mutants copying undamaged DNA in a gapped plasmid

Mutant Error rate (× 10−4) *
Single base substitution Single base deletion Single base insertion Complex** Tandem base substitution
WT 230 25 3 35 13
M14V 170 (0.7) 9 (0.4) 5 (1.8) 22 (0.6) 9 (0.7)
Q38A 260 (1.1) 18 (0.7) 16 (5.3) 100 (2.8) 43 (3.3)
Q38V 220 (1.0) 12 (0.5) 9 (3.1) 46 (1.3) 10 (0.8)
Y52E 73 (0.3) 10 (0.4) ≤1 (0.5) 3 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
R61A 74 (0.3) 7 (0.3) 4 (1.4) 7 (0.2) 1 (0.1)
S62A 170 (0.7) 11 (0.4) 5 (1.8) 16 (0.5) 8 (0.6)
S62G 170 (0.7) 14 (0.6) 3 (1.0) 20 (0.6) 8 (0.6)
R81C 180 (0.8) 21 (0.9) 7 (2.3) 36 (1.0) 9 (0.7)
E82D 120 (0.5) 13 (0.5) 8 (2.6) 20 (0.6) 5 (0.4)
*

Values given correspond to errors per 10,000 bases copied.

**

Complex errors are defined as multiple changes occurring within 3 bases, such as substitution-deletions and substitution-insertions. The tandem base substitutions error rates shown are a subset of the Complex errors reported. Values in parentheses for mutants are relative to WT rate.