Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Ecol. 2013 Mar 26;22(10):2760–2770. doi: 10.1111/mec.12290

Table 3.

Cline analysis results for yellow bar phenotype, AFLP genotype and mitochondrial clade. For cline midpoint and cline width, the 95% confidence intervals are given in parentheses. The best fitting model is indicated in the “Model” column with three asterisks (***). Note that y1 and y2 values for hindwing yellow bar width are the 1-scaled values (see Methods).

Model df Fitted asymptote values (y1/y2) Midpoint (km) Width (km) Log likelihood Likelihood ratio test P-value §

Hindwing yellow bar
   Step 3 0.32 / 0.62 679 - 681.5 NA 77.66
   Sigmoid*** 4 0.22 / 0.66 667.8 (719.5, 616.1) 90.2 (132.7, 47.7) 88.32 < 0.00001

AFLP genotype (% north)
   Step 3 0.27 / 0.90 668.0 - 680.4 NA 108.86
   Sigmoid*** 4 0.14 / 0.93 646.9 (653.4, 640,4) 31.7 (36.8, 26.6) 151.15 < 0.00001

mtDNA genotype (% E3 clade)
   Step*** 3 0.12 / 0.94 668.0 – 680.4 NA 2.94
   Sigmoid 4 0 / 1 661.5 (688.7, 634.3) 26.7 (46.9, 6.5) 2.84 > 0.999

§

step cline vs sigmoid model