Skip to main content
. 2013 May 21;19(2):186–194. doi: 10.1177/159101991301900207

Table 1.

Characteristics of fifteen patients with A1As.

Patient no. Age/sex Aneurysm size
(mm)
Aneurysm neck
(mm)
Branch at
the neck
Location on
parent artery
Treatment Angiographic
outcome
Follow-up
(month)
Outcome
(GOS)

1 53/M 3.5×5.6 saccular 3.0 YES Superior Coiling, no shaped tip Co 4 5
2 49/M 3.4×4.3 saccular 3.3 NO Superior SAC, no shaped tip Co 10 5
3 57/F 3.3×4.2 saccular 2.9 NO Superior Coiling, S-shaped tip Co 4 5
4 62/F 3.4×3.5 saccular 2.8 NO Superior Coiling, Z-shaped tip Co 10 5
5 55/F 4.2×6.1 saccular 3.3 NO Superior Coiling, S-shaped tip Co 11 5
6 62/F 2.6×3.1 saccular 2.5 Yes Superior BAC, no shaped tip Co 35 5
7 77/F 4.5×4.7 saccular 3.4 NO Superior Coiling, S-shaped tip Co 23 5
8 49/F 4.9×5.5 saccular 3.7 NO Superior Coiling, Z-shaped tip Co 18 5
9 49/F 2.7×2.9 saccular 2.3 NO Superior BAC, S-shaped tip Co 14 5
10 39/F 4.2×4.4 saccular 3.2 NO Superior Coiling, S-shaped tip Co 15 5
11 47/F 15×17 saccular 6.2 Yes Superior SAC, no shaped tip Co 16 5
12 58/F 2.2×3.0 saccular 2.1 NO Superior BAC, U-shaped tip Co 31 5
13 37/F 3.0×3.5 saccular 2.8 NO Superior Coiling, S-shaped tip Co 12 5
14 42/F 3.8×4.5 saccular 3.1 NO Superior Coiling, S-shaped tip Co 13 5
15 73/F 3.5×4.6 saccular 3.2 NO Superior Coiling, U-shaped tip Co 24 5

BAC balloon-assisted coiling; SAC Stent-assisted coiling; Co Complete occlusion; GOS Glasgow outcome scale