Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2012:1479–1482. doi: 10.1109/ISBI.2012.6235851

Table 1.

Geometry extraction validation results using vascular trees of increasing complexity. We show results for 9 out of the 15 vascular trees that were generated. Mean and std were computed using all volumes.

#Nodes True Pos. % False Pos. % True Neg. % False Neg. % Accur. % Prec. % Sensit. % Specif. % Time (s.)
5 95.59 4.41 95.74 4.26 95.67 95.59 95.74 95.60 41
10 95.75 4.25 96.77 3.23 96.26 95.75 96.74 95.80 57
50 96.15 3.85 96.91 3.09 96.53 96.15 96.88 96.18 178
100 96.84 3.16 93.16 6.84 95.00 96.84 93.40 96.72 248
200 98.76 1.24 84.93 15.07 91.84 98.76 86.76 98.56 320
400 98.16 1.84 73.26 26.74 85.71 98.16 78.59 97.55 375
600 98.11 1.89 66.03 33.97 82.07 98.11 74.28 97.21 380
800 98.72 1.28 61.38 38.62 80.05 98.72 71.88 97.95 409
1000 97.89 2.11 57.73 42.27 77.81 97.89 69.84 96.48 449

mean(std) 97.5(1.1) 2.5(1.1) 79.5(15.4) 20.5(15.4) 88.5(7.3) 97.5(1.1) 84.0(10.9) 97.0(0.8) 292(140)

Intel Core 2 Duo 2.8 GHz.