Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 1;1(1):31–41. doi: 10.4161/worm.19504

Table 1. Different assay systems for analyzing thermotaxis.

Experimental conditions
 
Evaluations *
References
Thermal gradients   Assay times    
Spacial
nonlinear
0.5°C/cm–3.5°C/cma
1–2 h
track
5, 10, 11, 12, 32, 34, 35, 45, 59, 63, 64
 
linear
0.5°C/cm
1 h
distribution
5, 9, 12, 26, 32, 37, 45
 
(~0.5°C/cm)
0.5°C/cm
to 1 h (time course)
distribution
18
 
 
0.5°C/cm
1 h
run duration
24
 
 
0.5°C/cm
30 min
run duration
61
 
 
0.5°C/cm
30 min
IT duration
24
 
 
0.5°C/cm
25 min
IT temperature
18
 
 
0.4°C/cm
23 min
IT temperature
15
 
linear
1.15°C/cm
to 1 h (time course), 8 h
distribution
17
 
(~1°C/cm)
1.0°C/cm
35 min
run duration
13
 
 
0.8°C/cm
30 min
IT duration
24
 
 
1.1°C/cm
30 min
IT temperature
39
 
 
1.0°C/cm
25 min
IT temperature
18
 
 
0.9°C/cm
35 min
IT length and temperature
33
 
linear
1.4°C/cm
1 h
distribution
16
 
(1.4°C/cm)
1.4°C/cm
10 min
instantaneous velocities
16
 
linear
(various)
0.2°C/cm, 0.4°C/cm, 0.6°C/cm, 0.8°C/cm, 1.0°C/cm, 1.2°C/cm
1 h
distribution
19
 
 
0.3°C/cm, 0.5°C/cm, 1°C/cm, 1.5°C/cm
10 min
distribution
20
 
 
0.40°C/cm, 0.75°C/cm, 2°C/cm
23 min
IT amplitude
15
Temporal
crawling
± 0.5°C/min
5 min
run duration
15
 
swimming
± 4°C/min
30 sec
turning rate
15
 
 
± 2°C/min
15 minc
turning rate
36
    various stimulib
ex. from 0.4°C/min to 6.4°C/min
5–15 mind turning rate 61
*

Values were calculated from these ‘evaluations’ by respective equations in some articles.

a Cassata et al., Genesis, 2000.

b Sine-wave, upstep and downstep.

c repeated up (1min) and down (1min).

d involved the presentation of multiple stimulus waveforms.