Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013 Feb 4;59:41–54. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.01.016

Table 1.

Effects of TMZ and nNOS I on mitochondrial respiration

Substrates Experiments State 2 State 3 RCR

Complex I cntrl (n=6) 78.3±8.9 493.8±0.03 6.62±0.78
cntrl + TMZ (n=6) 77.3±7.5 409.7±0.04 5.61±0.92
cntrl + nNOS I (n=6) 60.5±7.4# 449.9±4.94 7.86±0.58#

HF (n=8) 56.0±7.8* 136.5±26.6* 2.43±0.21*
HF + TMZ (n=9) 93.7±7.3# 243.1±17.3# 2.59±0.32
HF + nNOS I (n=8) 75.2±3.9# 189.7±9.4# 2.52±0.18

Complex II cntrl (n=6) 230.2±32.1 548.5±27.5 2.53±0.22
cntrl + TMZ (n=6) 275.7±31.2 558.7±43.6 2.13±0.19
cntrl + nNOS I (n=6) 235.1±21.6 500.3±26.6 2.13±0.18

HF (n=5) 428.6±51.7* 584.0±34.3 1.50±0.28*
HF + TMZ (n=5) 329.4±65.9# 356.4±62.6# 1.54±0.58
HF + nNOS I (n=5) 424.1±49.3 552.4±46.5 1.30±0.59

Palmitoyl-carnitine cntrl (n=4) 124±6.3 522.0±52.0 4.19±0.38
cntrl + TMZ (n=4) 106±2.5# 405.7±27.3# 3.84±0.25
cntrl + 4-BA (n=4) 102.9±6.9# 391.5±58.4# 3.80±0.21

State 2 and state 3: rates of O2 consumption, nmol O2/min per 105 cells

RCR: state 3 respiration/state 2 respiration

*

P<0.05, HF compared to control cells

#

P<0.05, TMZ or nNOS I treated cells compared to cells in the absence of the drug