Table 3.
Differences in dietary patterns by car versus public transportation (PT) commute modes. New York, 2009-2010
| Car (n=79) | PT (n=101) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dietary pattern factor scores (quartile range) | ||||
|
| ||||
| Prudent dietary pattern mean score (SD) | 0.2 (1.2) | -0.1 (0.8) | Difference (95% CI)1 -0.3 (-0.6, 0.05) | |
| N (%) | OR (95%CI)1 | |||
| Q1 (< -0.7) | 15 (19.0) | 29 (29.0) | Ref. | |
| Q2 (-0.7, -0.31) | 20 (25.3) | 25 (25.0) | 1.3 (0.5, 3.4) | |
| Q3 (-0.3, 0.49) | 19 (24.1) | 26 (26.0) | 1.3 (0.5, 3.3) | |
| Q4 (≥ 0.5) | 25 (31.7) | 20 (20.0) | 2.1 (0.8, 5.8) | |
| Western dietary pattern mean score (SD) | 0.03 (0.9) | -0.02 (0.9) | -0.03 (-0.3, 0.3) | |
|
| ||||
| N (%) | OR (95%CI)1 | |||
| Q1(< -0.6) | 18 (22.8) | 29 (26.0) | Ref. | |
| Q2 (-0.6, -0.21) | 18 (22.8) | 27 (27.0) | 0.8 (0.3, 2.1) | |
| Q3 (-0.2, 0.39) | 22 (27.9) | 23 (23.0) | 1.2 (0.5, 3.2) | |
| Q4 (≥ 0.4) | 21 (26.6) | 24 (24.0) | 1.3 (0.5, 3.4) | |
CI= Confidence Interval, IQR=Interquartile Range (Q1-Q3), OR=Odds Ratio, Q=Quartiles,
1
Linear regression models were adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity and BMI.