Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun;103(6):e47–e53. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301275

TABLE 1—

Summary Statistics Comparing Residents of Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Undergoing Demolition or Housing Improvement With Control Group at Wave 1: GoWell Survey, 2006

Variable Control Group (n = 283), % or Mean Score Demolition Group (n = 443), % or Mean Score Housing Improvement Group (n = 315), % or Mean Score Control vs Demolition Group, P Control vs Housing Improvement Group, P
Gender .017 .94
 Male 34.63 43.57 34.92
 Female 65.37 56.43 65.08
Building type <.001 <.001
 House 27.92 0.90 16.19
 Low-rise apartment building 59.72 9.71 41.27
 High-rise apartment building 12.37 89.39 42.54
Age, y <.001 .946
 < 26 19.93 43.51 21.02
 26–64 43.06 36.45 42.68
 > 64 37.01 20.05 36.31
Country of birth <.001 .27
 United Kingdom 94.35 59.14 92.06
 Elsewhere 5.65 40.86 7.94
Educational qualifications .007 .251
 Yes 20.14 12.64 16.51
 No 79.86 87.36 83.49
Housing status <.001 <.001
 Owner occupied 31.80 5.64 18.73
 Rented 68.20 94.36 81.27
Household type <.001 .472
 No children 77.74 56.43 75.24
 Children 22.26 43.57 24.76
Health scorea
 Mental 47.77 47.87 47.97 .894 .814
 Physical 46.75 48.58 45.98 .025 .379

Note. Percentages may not total 100% because of rounding.

aDerived from the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey version 2; the range is 0–100, with higher scores indicating better health.