Table A2. The total trial counts and number of stimuli placed in each rating category are shown for each stimulus type (blank, weak, medium and strong) for each subject. Also shown are either the absolute or relative (blue italics) stimulus energy measurements reported as photons at the cornea. An asterisk (*) in the photons column indicates values after a correction for estimated light loss due to reflections from antireflection coated spectacle lenses (1%, subjects 2 and 4) or trial lenses (8%, subjects 3 and 5). Trials with reported ratings of ‘1’ were judged as definitely not seen and trials with reported ratings of 2 to 6 were judged to be seen with increasing confidence. In general the ratings ‘2’ and ‘3’ were used when the subject was uncertain as to whether or not the stimulus was seen and ratings of ‘4’, ‘5’, or ‘6’ reflected subjectively increasing brightness. Non-zero blank intensities are reported because the method used to control the illumination through the pinhole directed some residual light even on the darkest setting. The values reported, generally at least 2.5 log units lower that the lowest stimulus values used, are upper estimates on the maximum light at the cornea during blank presentations, the real values possibly being less due to uncertainties in accurately measuring the stimulus intensities at the lowest light levels. These non-zero blank values were used in fitting subjects' frequency of seeing curves and interpolating thresholds, but false positive rates were left uncorrected since the required correction was insignificantly small compared with the inherent uncertainty in the data.