Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Occup Environ Med. 2012 Oct;54(10):1253–1258. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31825a2574

TABLE 3.

Prevalence Ratio Estimates for Neurologic Symptoms Among 16,340 Participants in the Agricultural Health Study, 1993–1997: Cattle Exposure Compared With No Farm Animal Exposure

Numbness Weakness Speech Problems Blurred Vision Night Blindness
All cattle farmers (beef, dairy, or both) (n = 8,878) compared with reference group (n = 7,462), Total N = 16,340
Unadjusted model (n = 16,340)
 Prevalence ratio [95% CI] 1.24 [1.16–1.33] 1.21 [1.11–1.32] 1.12 [0.96–1.30] 1.05 [0.95–1.16] 0.91 [0.83–0.997]
P P < 0.0001 P < 0.0001 P = 0.155 P = 0.329 P = 0.043
Adjusted model (n = 15,008)
 Prevalence Ratio [95% CI] 1.22 [1.12–1.32] 1.25 [1.14–1.38] 0.97 [0.82–1.16] 1.10 [0.99–1.24] 0.94 [0.84–1.05]
P P < 0.0001 P < 0.0001 P = 0.752 P = 0.087 P = 0.253
Cattle farmers with no other farm animals (n = 4,275) compared with reference group (n = 7,462), Total N = 11,737
Unadjusted model (n = 11,737)
 Prevalence ratio [95% CI] 1.16 [1.07–1.26] 1.16 [1.05–1.29] 0.99 [0.82–1.20] 1.04 [0.92–1.17] 0.93 [0.83–1.05]
P P = 0.0007 P = 0.005 P = 0.929 P = 0.557 P = 0.239
Adjusted model (n = 10,685)
 Prevalence ratio [95% CI] 1.15 [1.04–1.26] 1.16 [1.03–1.30] 0.93 [0.76–1.14] 1.05 [0.92–1.20] 0.93 [0.82–1.06]
P P = 0.004 P = 0.012 P = 0.475 P = 0.446 P = 0.269
Beef farmers (n = 8,136) compared with reference group (n = 7,462), Total N = 15,598
Unadjusted model (n = 15,598)
 Prevalence ratio [95% CI] 1.23 [1.14–1.32] 1.21 [1.10–1.32] 1.11 [0.95–1.30] 1.04 [0.94–1.15] 0.90 [0.82–0.996]
P P < 0.0001 P < 0.0001 P = 0.174 P = 0.484 P = 0.040
Adjusted model (n = 14,314)
 Prevalence ratio [95% CI] 1.21 [1.12–1.31] 1.24 [1.12–1.37] 0.97 [0.81–1.15] 1.08 [0.96–1.21] 0.94 [0.84–1.05]
P P < 0.0001 P < 0.0001 P = 0.720 P = 0.184 P = 0.247
Dairy farmers (n = 1,168) compared with reference group (n = 7,462), Total N = 8,630
Unadjusted model (n = 8,630)
 Prevalence ratio [95% CI] 1.44 [1.26–1.65] 1.38 [1.17–1.62] 1.28 [0.97–1.70] 1.17 [0.97–1.42] 0.92 [0.76–1.11]
P P < 0.0001 P = 0.0001 P = 0.086 P = 0.108 P = 0.377
Adjusted model (n = 7,863)
 Prevalence ratio [95% CI] 1.40 [1.21–1.63] 1.43 [1.19–1.72] 0.98 [0.71–1.35] 1.31 [1.05–1.63] 0.97 [0.79–1.20]
P P < 0.0001 P < 0.0001 P = 0.887 P = 0.015 P = 0.798

Prevalence ratios of neurologic symptoms for cattle farmers compared with 7,462 farmers without any self-reported exposure to farm animals.

Adjusted Model covariates: state, race, gender, age, education, alcohol consumption, smoking, frequency of consumption of hamburger, beef-steaks, chicken, pork chops/ham steak, and bacon/sausage, and exposure (yes/no) to insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, and fumigants.

Results significant at P < 0.05 are bolded.

CI, confidence interval.