Table 2.
American Caucasian,
n
= 117 |
American Chinese,
n
= 129 |
Mainland Chinese,
n
= 112 |
P
Value |
|
Age, y | 59.7 ± 11.6 | 59.4 ± 12.0 | 59.4 ± 11.7 | 0.98 |
Sex, M/F | 63/54 | 62/67 | 51/61 | 0.43* |
SE, D | −1.42 ± 3.9 | −2.10 ± 3.8 | −0.07 ± 2.2 | <0.0001† |
AL, mm | 24.3 ± 1.7 | 24.5 ± 2.02 | 23.4 ± 1.0 | <0.0001† |
LT, mm | 4.51 ± 0.4 | 4.49 ± 0.5 | 4.70 ± 0.4 | 0.0002† |
ACD, mm | 3.42 ± 0.3 | 3.23 ± 0.4 | 2.94 ± 0.4 | <0.0001† |
Demographic data and ocular measurements compared among three ethnic groups using ANOVA. Data are presented as mean ± SD except for sex, which is presented as male-to-female ratio. Numbers in bold denote statistical significance (P < 0.05).
P value from Pearson χ2 test among all three groups.
When pairwise comparisons were done, mainland Chinese were found to be significantly different from the other two cohorts. No significant differences were detected between American Caucasians and American Chinese.