Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 31;6:35. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-35

Table 2.

Biological validation of alignment graphs

(a) D.melanogaster vs S.cerevisiae  
 
Fly
Yeast
Method
TPR
TNR
TPR
TNR
iso_greedy
535
17.00%
324
43.00%
iso_hungarian
457
15.20%
1066
44.00%
mat3_auction
490
15.40%
1132
38.30%
mat3_greedy
448
17.00%
1102
44.00%
(b) D.melanogaster vs H.sapiens
 
 
Fly
Human
Method
TPR
TNR
TPR
TNR
iso_greedy
1067
30.10%
191
9.00%
iso_hungarian
974
31.50%
671
14.30%
mat3_auction
1020
27.00%
519
12.50%
mat3_greedy
1029
30.80%
670
17.00%
(c) D.melanogaster vs E.coli
 
 
Fly
Bacterium
Method
TPR
TNR
TPR
TNR
iso_greedy
41
11.63%
66
16.60%
iso_hungarian
60
10.38%
175
29.35%
mat3_auction
90
9.80%
236
32.00%
mat3_greedy
56
10.73%
235
32.58%
(d) H.sapiens vs S.cerevisiae
 
 
Human
Yeast
Method
TPR
TNR
TPR
TNR
iso_greedy
971
31.74%
406
17.97%
iso_hungarian
1010
31.27%
1063
41.76%
mat3_auction
1064
28.40%
1083
40.16%
mat3_greedy
989
33.33%
1095
46.14%
(e) S.cerevisiae vs E.coli
 
 
Yeast
Bacterium
Method
TPR
TNR
TPR
TNR
iso_greedy
419
46.10%
63
15.00%
iso_hungarian
359
46.60%
231
38.24%
mat3_auction
400
40.72%
274
35.75%
mat3_greedy
378
44.22%
289
35.37%
(f) E.coli vs H.sapiens
 
 
Bacterium
Human
Method
TPR
TNR
TPR
TNR
iso_greedy
52
16.77%
472
29.56%
iso_hungarian
158
35.63%
386
28.40%
mat3_auction
252
32.96%
557
34.80%
mat3_greedy 219 36.00% 444 29.73%

Biological validation of alignment graphs based on the method of Kalaev et al. [21]. The TPR column contains the total number of GO terms covered in the biological process branch, and the TNR column represents the percent of components that were enriched in each species.