Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar 1;208(6):460.e1–460.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.050

Table 3.

Risk of cesarean by measures of the midpelvis

Exposure Group Number Cesarean* (n, %) RR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI) p
Transverse Diameter <10th (≤9.0 cm) (n=77) 35 (45.5%) 1.7 (1.3–2.3) 2.0 (1.0–3.8) 0.04
>10th (>9.0 cm) (n=349) 92 (26.3%) Ref Ref
<5th (≤8.0 cm) (n=24) 13 (54.2%) 1.9 (1.3–2.8) 2.0 (0.7–5.5) 0.19
>5th (>8.0 cm) (n=402) 114 (28.4)%) Ref Ref
Anteroposterior Diameter <10th (≤9.5 cm) (n=51) 50 (98.0%) 4.8 (3.9–5.8) 112.7 (14.9–854.1) <0.01
>10th (>9.5 cm) (n=375) 77 (20.5%) Ref Ref
<5th (≤9.0 cm) (n=28) 28 (100%) 4.0 (3.4–4.8) - -
>5th (>9.0 cm) (n=398) 99 (24.9%) Ref -
Circumference <10th (≤29.8 cm) (n=47) 41 (87.2) 3.8 (3.1–4.8) 19.3 (6.9–53.6) <0.01
>10th (>29.8 cm) (n=379) 86 (22.7%) Ref Ref
<5th (≤29.0 cm) (n=20) 19 (95.0%) 3.6 (3.0–4.3) - -
>5th (>29.0 cm) (n=406) 108 (26.7%) Ref -
*

The percentage of cesarean deliveries represents the positive predictive value (<10th, <5th) or the negative predictive value (>10th, >5th) of the pelvic measurement.

Adjusted for prior cesarean delivery, labor induction

-Adjusted analysis not performed