Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Apr;23(2):101–105. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31819afb80

Table 1.

Comparison of the facet angle and tropism between the individuals with and without spondylolysis at L5 level.

Individuals with
spondylolysis
(N=17)
Individuals without
spondylolysis
(N=171)

Comparison
(p-value) **
Age (years) 56.29±11.19 52.22±10.69 0.1381
BMI (kg/m2) 27.82±3.51 27.90±5.20 0.9509
Sex (females)(prevalence) 3 (17.7%) 77 (49.4%) 0.0229
Facet orientation L3-L4 Rt * 36.88±9.45 37.53±8.74 0.7740
Facet orientation L3-L4 Lt * 37.94±11.34 38.19±9.40 0.9191
Facet orientation L4-L5 Rt * 45.59±10.64 45.24±10.68 0.8985
Facet orientation L4-L5 Lt * 49.06±7.81 47.39±10.69 0.5307
Facet orientation L5-S1 Rt * 48.24±11.65 46.97±11.29 0.6614
Facet orientation L5-S1 Lt * 50.53±6.91 49.17+13.19 0.4932
Facet tropism (continuous) L3-L4 6.47±4.12 6.02±4.99 0.7214
Facet tropism (continuous) L4-L5 6.53±5.94 6.98±6.16 0.7755
Facet tropism (continuous) L5-S1 8.88±11.32 7.06±7.84 0.5256
*

Relative to sagittal plane.

**

Results of χ2 test for dichotomous variables and of t-test for continuous variables. Statistically significant association at p<0.05 level marked bold.