Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 9;17(6):1992–2001. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0467-3

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the sample at baseline

Variables Treatment
SC n = 65 MI-CBT n = 70 MI-CBT/mDOT n = 69
n % or mean (SD) n % or mean (SD) n % or mean (SD)
Age—Mean (SD) 65 40.4 (8.2) 70 40.8 (9.6) 69 39.9 (10.7)
Male gender at birth (%) 50 76.9 % 50 71.4 % 55 79.7 %
Ethnicity/race Hispanic (%) 4 6.2 % 8 11.4 % 7 10.1 %
African American (%) 38 58.5 % 35 50.0 % 43 62.3 %
White (%) 21 32.3 % 22 31.4 % 22 31.9 %
Other (%) 6 9.2 % 13 18.6 % 4 5.8 %
Income $12,000/year (%) 40 69.0 % 44 67.7 % 41 66.1 %
Education
 Less than high school degree (%) 17 26.2 % 14 20.0 % 15 21.7 %
 High school graduate/GED (%) 21 32.3 % 20 28.6 % 21 30.4 %
 More than high school degree (%) 27 41.5 % 36 51.4 % 33 47.8 %
Work status
 Working full time/part time (%)a 17 26.2 % 23 32.9 % 20 29.0 %
 On disability (%) 31 47.7 % 25 35.7 % 21 30.4 %
 No income (%) 9 13.9 % 14 20.0 % 21 30.4 %
Married/committed relationship 15 23.4 % 15 21.7 % 20 29.0 %
Covered by private insurance (%) 5 7.7 % 5 7.1 % 8 11.6 %
CD4—% below 200 cells 31 47.6 % 25 36.2 % 33 47.8 %
ART Naïve 21 32.3 % 24 34.3 % 24 34.8 %
Illicit drug use in last 3 months (%) 29 44.6 % 29 42.0 % 30 43.5 %
Binge drinking in last 30 days (%) 15 23.1 % 11 15.9 % 14 20.3 %
CES-D total score >16 (%) 35 53.8 % 39 56.5 % 33 47.8 %

aCategories are not mutually exclusive and three participants both worked and collected disability. Results for some baseline data for the EC group is based on 69/70 participants as a portion of one participant’s baseline evaluation was lost during data transfer