Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 25;121(5):619–624. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205431

Table 2.

Adjusted associations between measures of secondary pesticide exposure and blood pressure and heart rate differences among children (n = 271).

Predictor Model 1 SBP [mmHg (95% CI)] Model 1 DBP [mmHg (95% CI)] Model 1 heart rate [BPM (95% CI)] Model 2 SBP [mmHg (95% CI)] Model 2 DBP [mmHg (95% CI)] Model 2 heart rate [BPM (95% CI)]
AChE (per 1-U/mL decrease) –2.20 (–4.51, 0.11)** –3.19 (–5.21, –1.17)* –2.24 (–5.90, 1.41) –2.86 (–5.20, –0.53)* –2.89 (–5.00, –0.78)* –3.01 (–6.79, 0.77)
Flower worker cohabitation (yes vs. no) –1.50 (–3.34, 0.33) –0.43 (–2.06, 1.20) 1.91 (–0.99, 4.80) –1.72 (–3.53, 0.08)** –0.49 (–2.12, 1.14) 1.62 (–1.27, 4.52)
Duration of cohabitation with a flower worker (per year) –0.33 (–0.64, –0.02)* –0.13 (–0.41, 0.15) 0.12 (–0.37, 0.61) –0.32 (–0.64, –0.02)* –0.12 (–0.39, 0.16) 0.11 (–0.38, 0.61)
No. of flower workers at home (per worker) –0.68 (–1.49, 0.13) –0.36 (–1.08, 0.36) 0.34 (–0.94, 1.62) –0.79 (–1.58, 0.005)# –0.43 (–1.14, 0.28) 0.51 (–0.76, 1.79)
No. of bad practices (per practice)a –0.66 (–1.31, –0.01)* –0.34 (–0. 90, 0.22) 0.63 (–0.35, 1.62) –0.82 (–1.45, –0.20)* –0.37 (–0.92, 0.18) 0.56 (–0.43, 1.56)
BPM, beats per minute. Model 1: age, sex, race, height-for-age z-score and examination date. When the predictor was AChE activity, hemoglobin concentration was also included in the model. Model 2: model 1 + heart rate, income, number of smokers living at home, residence distance to nearest flower plantation edge, pesticide use within household lot, and pesticide use by contiguous neighbors. When heart rate was the outcome of interest, model 2 did not include heart rate as an adjustment variable; when the predictor was AChE activity, flower worker cohabitation was added to the model. an = 228. *p < 0.05. **p = 0.06. #p = 0.052.