Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr;103(4):740–746. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300579

FIGURE 1—

FIGURE 1—

Directed acyclic graph to test the hypothesized relationship of cigarette excise tax and periodontitis operating via cigarette pack sales and secondhand smoke exposure pathway.

Note. CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio. All ORs adjusted for age in years, gender, and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycle (i.e., 1999–2000; 2001–2002; 2003–2004).

aORs are for each additional $0.10 in tax excise (expressed as constant-dollar value in 1982–1984).

bData available as a supplement to the online version of this article at http://www.ajph.org for the relationship between cigarette excise tax and per capita sales.

cORs are for each additional pack/person/month cigarette sales.

dSecondhand smoke exposure dichotomized as < 0.05 ng/mL vs ≥ 0.05 ng/mL.

eCenters for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology case classification for moderate or severe periodontitis defined as ≥ 2 interproximal sites with clinical attachment level ≥ 4 mm, not on the same tooth, or ≥ 2 interproximal sites with probing depth ≥ 5 mm, not on the same tooth.