TABLE 2—
Multilevel Model Parameter Estimates for Communities That Care (CTC) Compared with Control Conditions: Community Youth Development Study, United States, 2009
| Mean in 2009 |
Slope Over Timea |
|||
| Prevention System Construct | b (SE) | P | b (SE) | P |
| Adoption of a science-based approachb | 1.470c (0.22) | < .001 | 0.56 (0.14) | .001 |
| General community support for prevention | 0.080 (0.07) | .25 | 0.04 (0.03) | .25 |
| Desired prevention funding | 3.510 (1.52) | .032 | 1.06 (0.63) | .11 |
| Community norms against adolescent drug use | 0.130 (0.14) | .38 | 0.06 (0.03) | .044 |
| Community collaboration for prevention | −0.006 (0.05) | .9 | 0.03 (0.02) | .13 |
| Use of the social development strategy | 0.050 (0.13) | .72 | NA | NA |
Note. NA = not available.
a
Time specified as survey wave, 0 (2001) to 3 (2009).
b
Analyzed using cumulative probability model to describe difference in log-odds of being in 1 stage higher of adoption.
c
Odds ratio = 4.34; 95% confidence interval = 2.76, 6.83.