Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar;103(3):508–515. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300898

TABLE 2—

Eating Behaviors of Weight-Teased Young Adult Women Aged 18 to 26 Years by Insult Types Received: 3 Large US Universities, Fall 2009–Spring 2010

Weight Teasing Insult Typesa
ANCOVAb
Characteristic (Possible Score Range) 1 Type, Mean ±SD (n = 251) 2 Types, Mean ±SD (n = 158) 3 Types, Mean ±SD (n = 276) F P
Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire
Restraint (0–6) 1.31 ±1.41 1.12 ±1.43 2.06 ±1.57 16.43cde <.001
Eating concerns (0–6) 0.89 ±1.08 0.95 ±1.17 1.61 ±1.28 24.88cde <.001
Weight concerns (0–6) 2.09 ±1.56 2.18 ±1.56 3.13 ±1.45 20.51cde <.001
Shape concerns (0–6) 2.43 ±1.58 2.56 ±1.55 3.54 ±1.42 25.60cde <.001
Binge eating (0–28) 1.49 ±4.09 1.89 ±4.52 2.97 ±5.37 6.75cd .001
Inappropriate compensatory behaviors
 Self-induced vomiting (0–6) 0.31 ±1.23 0.32 ±1.24 0.53 ±1.63 2.66 .07
 Misuse of medicine (0–6) 0.21 ±1.00 0.37 ±1.34 0.50 ±1.49 3.89cd .021
 Excessive exercise (0–6) 0.58 ±1.17 0.70 ±1.22 0.83 ±1.50 2.54 .08
Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire
Emotional eating (1–4) 2.19 ±0.71 2.21 ±0.75 2.45 ±0.78 5.82cde .003
Disinhibited eating (1–4) 2.12 ±0.62 2.21 ±0.63 2.42 ±0.70 12.70cde <.001
Dichotomous thinking in eating disorders (1-4) 2.79 ±0.77 2.80 ±0.78 2.94 ±0.78 2.96 .052
Perception of Teasing Scale
Weight-teasing frequency (1–5) 1.48 ±0.21 2.13 ±0.45 3.37 ±0.93 534.62cdef <.001
Weight-teasing effect (1–5) 3.12 ±1.22 3.24 ±1.14 4.06 ±0.91 48.78cde <.001
Body mass indexg 23.00 ±3.53 23.37 ±4.59 25.73 ±5.40

Note. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance.

a

Three types of weight-teasing insults were being made fun of because of one’s weight, being called weight-related names (e.g., “fatso”), and being laughed at because of one’s weight.

b

Analysis of covariance with body mass index and eating disorder diagnosis as covariates.

c

Significant pairwise differences among the adjusted means for the variety of weight teasing insult types received, as determined by Bonferroni procedure only when a main effect (P < .05) occurred.

d

Those receiving 1 insult scored significantly lower than those receiving 3 Insults.

e

Those receiving 2 insults scored significantly lower than those receiving 3 insults.

f

Those receiving 1 insult scored significantly lower than those receiving 2 insults.

g

Body mass index defined as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters.