Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 20;118(4):1132–1139. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-324392

Table 3.

Baseline characteristics and outcomes of selected series of NMAT for lymphoma/CLL

Reference n Age, y (median) Histology (no.) Regimen Chemosensitive, % CR at transplantation, % Prior treatment, no. Bulk > 5 cm, % HSCT-CI ≥ 3, % OS, % (y) PFS, % (y)
5 47 53 FL FCR 100 38 3 NR NR 85 (5) 83 (5)
6 35 58 MCL PFA/FCR 83 46 3 NR 40 53 (6) 46 (6)
26 41 54 CLL FluMel-Campath 83 12 3 NR NR 51 (2) 45 (2)
2 82 56 CLL/SLL 2 Gy TBI ± Flu 51 6 3 29* 28 50 (5) 39 (5)
3 31 52 DLBCL 2 Gy TBI ± Flu 72 44 4 NR 41 45 (3) 35 (3)
4 62 54 Indolent (87% FL) 2 Gy TBI ± Flu 63 26 6 8 27 52 (3) 43 (3)
1 33 54 MCL 2 Gy TBI + Flu 61 39 4 18* 9 65 (2) 60 (2)
24 40 55 Indolent (32), MCL (8) Zevalin + Flu + 2 Gy TBI 85 18 4 18 NR 51 (2) 43 (2)
Current study 40 58 Indolent (18), DLBCL (14), MCL (8) Zevalin + Flu + 2 Gy TBI 15 0 6 43 63 54 (2) 31 (2)

HSCT-CI indicates Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Comorbidity Index22; PFA, cisplatin, fludarabine, and cytarabine; Flu, fludarabine; Mel, melphalan; and NR, not reported.

*

≥ 5 cm.

Charlson comorbidity scores.27