Table 2.
Distribution of captured anopheline species at sites along the Mazan River in Peru
| An. darlingi | An. mediopunctatus | An. kompi | An. nuneztovari | An. oswaldoi | An. peryassui | An. shannoni | Unidentified | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACH |
539 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
557 |
|
ARA |
386 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
388 |
|
CAL |
188 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
192 |
|
CAM |
1488 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
1502 |
|
CCC |
88 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
89 |
|
CCH |
48 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
|
CPA |
160 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
161 |
|
CPI |
272 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
274 |
|
CSC |
644 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
648 |
|
CTI |
8 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
|
CUR |
68 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
70 |
|
MAP |
253 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
254 |
|
MAT |
2588 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
2595 |
|
PCH |
85 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
85 |
|
QAM1 |
21 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
36 |
|
QAM2 |
136 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
145 |
|
QAR |
310 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
321 |
|
QBU |
103 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
103 |
|
QPA |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
|
QPI |
834 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
853 |
|
QSA |
18 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
| Total | 8246 |
25 |
1 |
2 |
40 |
3 |
1 |
46 |
8364 |
| (98.58) | (0.30) | (0.01) | (0.02) | (0.48) | (0.04) | (0.01) | (0.56) |
In the final row, the percent of total for each species is listed in parenthesis.