Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 5;8(6):e66245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066245

Table 2. Summary of echinoid divergence time estimates comparing uniform and informative gamma priors.

Uniform Priors Informative Gamma Priors Summary
Node Mean Node Age (95% HPD) Mean Node Age (95% HPD) Dmean %Dmean DHPD %DHPD
1 (root) 317.34 (271, 355) 276.16 (260.4, 307.46) 41.18 12.98% 36.94 43.98%
2 73.89 (25.9, 139.35) 59.85 (17.34, 117.63) 14.04 19.00% 13.16 11.60%
3 39.89 (7.43, 81.8) 30.21 (6, 65.29) 9.68 24.27% 15.08 20.28%
4 286.59 (230.42, 342.64) 222 (199.6, 254.9) 64.59 22.54% 56.92 50.72%
5 263.72 (206.44, 320.88) 202.46 (177.32, 234.16) 61.26 23.23% 57.6 50.33%
6 246.31 (183.41, 312.85) 179.48 (133.54, 219.88) 66.83 27.13% 43.1 33.30%
7 207.12 (145.5, 269.3) 145.67 (102.73, 186.9) 61.45 29.67% 39.63 32.01%
8 178.36 (123.56, 238.13) 120.54 (83.92, 160.64) 57.82 32.42% 37.85 33.04%
9 162.77 (108.91, 216.33) 107.23 (73.46, 143.27) 55.54 34.12% 37.61 35.01%
10 137.9 (89.25, 187.3) 84.3 (57.41, 113.92) 53.6 38.87% 41.54 42.37%
11 104.22 (64.73, 147.81) 65.55 (42.73, 91.19) 38.67 37.10% 34.62 41.67%
12 80.68 (44.38, 117.61) 51.81 (31.22, 75.37) 28.87 35.78% 29.08 39.71%
13 72.39 (35.64, 109.19) 48.17 (24.84, 71.12) 24.22 33.46% 27.27 37.08%
14 22.36 (1.25, 53.37) 15.97 (1.31, 37.36) 6.39 28.58% 16.07 30.83%
15 39.03 (13.39, 68.8) 25.92 (8.98, 45.65) 13.11 33.59% 18.74 33.82%
16 52.57 (19.29, 87.47) 32.32 (11.43, 56.61) 20.25 38.52% 23 33.73%
17 11.94 (0.98, 27.47) 8.53 (0.99, 19.43) 3.41 28.56% 8.05 30.39%
18 99.76 (39.55, 162.58) 67.24 (27.6, 105.72) 32.52 32.60% 44.91 36.50%
19 34.46 (8.17, 68.51) 25.79 (6.32, 51.75) 8.67 25.16% 14.91 24.71%
20 11.72 (0.76, 27.61) 8.68 (0.76, 20.94) 3.04 25.94% 6.67 24.84%
21 103.13 (44.15, 166.81) 70.32 (30.77, 115.58) 32.81 31.81% 37.85 30.86%
22 86.67 (34.15, 146.83) 57.7 (23.63, 98.24) 28.97 33.43% 38.07 33.79%
23 36.88 (9.24, 73.7) 25.12 (5.48, 51.13) 11.76 31.89% 18.81 29.18%
24 193.69 (108.37, 279.41) 140.41 (74.09, 199.29) 53.28 27.51% 45.84 26.80%
25 116.54 (39.74, 193.36) 83.5 (28.22, 140.42) 33.04 28.35% 41.42 26.96%
26 232.29 (175.19, 287.57) 181.66 (171.6, 198.37) 50.63 21.80% 85.61 76.18%
27 210.12 (161.63, 263.51) 166.64 (152.41, 182.25) 43.48 20.69% 72.04 70.71%
28 195.13 (150.86, 244.03) 159.8 (150.8, 174) 35.33 18.11% 69.97 75.10%
29 125.64 (97.81, 162.23) 112.52 (96.01, 132.04) 13.12 10.44% 28.39 44.07%
30 77.95 (39.91, 118.25) 64.9 (29.13, 102.12) 13.05 16.74% 5.35 6.83%
31 52.75 (21.93, 86.86) 42.19 (14.59, 73.7) 10.56 20.02% 5.82 8.96%
32 31.95 (8.72, 60.79) 24.54 (6.15, 50.45) 7.41 23.19% 7.77 14.92%
33 43.73 (13.62, 78.98) 33.88 (8.51, 65.7) 9.85 22.52% 8.17 12.50%
34 108.64 (93.5, 136.7) 101.07 (93.5, 115.08) 7.57 6.97% 21.62 50.05%
35 166.78 (114.26, 225.5) 113.73 (99.6, 137.84) 53.05 31.81% 73 65.62%
36 124.98 (76.09, 176.54) 81.41 (54.42, 107.18) 43.57 34.86% 47.69 47.48%
37 100.94 (57.89, 148.21) 61.26 (40.59, 81.49) 39.68 39.31% 49.42 54.72%
38 75.3 (33.76, 117.91) 45.25 (22.69, 69.05) 30.05 39.91% 37.79 44.91%
39 44.45 (13.66, 78.45) 28.41 (10.7, 48.58) 16.04 36.09% 26.91 41.53%
40 46.85 (6.09, 107) 32.69 (4.51, 71.9) 14.16 30.22% 33.52 33.22%
41 12.57 (1.11, 31.14) 9.75 (0.69, 24.89) 2.82 22.43% 5.83 19.41%
42 232.02 (158.91, 312.28) 182.41 (123.61, 237.76) 49.61 21.38% 39.22 25.57%
43 196.12 (117.11, 273.54) 152.08 (88.27, 209.5) 44.04 22.46% 35.2 22.50%
44 80.65 (26.24, 146.36) 58.04 (19.79, 107.64) 22.61 28.03% 32.27 26.86%
45 140.37 (61.13, 222.16) 104.15 (37.88, 166.97) 36.22 25.80% 31.94 19.83%
46 30.18 (5.58, 65.73) 22.33 (3.71, 50.52) 7.85 26.01% 13.34 22.18%

Nodes in bold were employed as calibrations in the divergence time analyses. The mean node age and lower and upper bounds of the 95% HPD are shown for each node. Summary statistics provided include the absolute and percentage difference in mean node age (Dmean and%Dmean, respectively), and the absolute and percentage difference in the width of the 95% HPD Node Age (DHPD and%DHPD, respectively).