Criteria for evidence-based assessment
Category | Criteria |
---|---|
Well-established assessment | The measure must have been presented in at least two peer-reviewed articles by different investigators or investigatory teams. |
Sufficient detail about the measure to allow critical evaluation and replication (eg, measure and manual provided or available upon request) | |
Detailed information (eg, statistics presented) indicating good validity and reliability in at least one peer-reviewed article. | |
Approaching well-established assessment | The measure must have been presented in at least two peer-reviewed articles, which may be by the same investigator or investigatory team. |
Sufficient detail about the measure to allow critical evaluation and replication (eg, measure and manual provided or available upon request). | |
Validity and reliability information presented in either vague terms (eg, no statistics presented) or moderate values. | |
Promising assessment | The measure must have been presented in at least one peer-reviewed article. |
Sufficient detail about the measure to allow critical evaluation and replication (eg, measure and manual provided or available upon request). | |
Validity and reliability information presented in either vague terms (eg, no statistics presented) or moderate values. |
Adapted from Cohen et al (25)