Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 28;8(4):398–408. doi: 10.4161/epi.24199

Table 2. Comparison between observed nucleosome distribution and support vector machine predicted nucleosome-forming and -inhibitory sequences in the TSSs of three genes with altered nucleosome distribution in mop1–1 mutants.

Gene Tissue typea Average correlationb
NOL:WT; NOL:Mu; NOL:Total
Flavanone 3-hydroxylase1
LF
0.700; 0.710; 0.700
 
TSL
0.710; 0.710; 0.710
 
ESc
0.583; 0.592; 0.588
Liguleless1
LFc
0.190; 0.398; 0.294
 
TSLc
0.276; 0.412; 0.344
 
ESc
0.129; 0.378; 0.253
Yabby15
LF
0.113; 0.158; 0.240
 
TSLc
0.129; 0.060; 0.095
  ES 0.321; 0.158; 0.240

a LF indicates leaf tissue, TSL indicates immature tassel, and ES indicates immature ear shoot. bCovariance (r-value) was calculated for each pair of wild type replicates (WT) and mutant replicates (Mu) compared with the NOL plot and averaged to determine the average correlation between the NOL and each genotype (NOL:WT and NOL:Mu respectively). The average r-value of all replicates and genotypes for each tissue compared with the NOL (NOL:Total) is also reported. In cases where the r-value was negative, the absolute value was utilized for averaging. cTissues where apparent differences in nucleosome position were noted between wild type and mutant genotypes.