Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Jul 21;219(3):805–814. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2403-4

Table 2. Photobeam counts before and after instrumental extinction training.

Mean photobeam breaks (+/−SEM) gathered after the final day of instrumental training and immediately after extinction training the following day in riluzole- and fluoxetine-treated mice are shown. These values represent the raw data used to generate normalized counts represented in figures 2d and e. Control mice are collapsed into a single group. Note that only 60 μg/ml riluzole and fluoxetine appreciably increase photobeam counts after extinction training.

Group Post-training photobeam counts (min. 45–60) Post-extinction photobeam counts (min. 0–15)
saccharin control 1504.8 +/− 138.0 1591.1 +/− 256.0
6 μg/ml riluzole 1876.7 +/−291.2 998.5 +/− 304.8
30 μg/ml riluzole 1330.6 +/− 130.8 854.6 +/− 99.7
60 μg/ml riluzole 1282.0 +/− 108.3 1630.3 +/− 209.6
160 μg/ml fluoxetine 2017.3 +/− 179.1 3472.3 +/− 130.3