Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2013 Apr 1;190(9):4707–4716. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203465

Table III.

Sensitivity Analysis Results fixing antigen dose.

NAME LOW DOSE HIGH DOSE
CD4 in the Lymph Node
  1. IL10 half saturation on delaying IDC maturation (Lung) [hsI10-DC] (+)

  2. IL10 half saturation on delaying precursor Th1 proliferation (LN) [hsI10-T0LN] (*) (+)

CD8 in the Lymph Node
  1. Max IDC infection/uptake rate in the LN (*)(+)[k12a];

  2. Rate (likelihood) of Naïve CD4+ T cell priming when encountering a MDC (LN)[k14] (*)(+);

  3. Scaling factor between lung and LN compartments [ϒ] (*)(-);

  1. IL10 half saturation on delaying IDC maturation (Lung) [hsI10-DC] (+)

  2. IL10 half saturation on delaying precursor Th1 proliferation (LN) [hsI10-T0LN] (*) (+)

  3. MDC migration rate from the lung to the LN [φ] (*)(+)

CD4 in the Lung
  1. IL10 half saturation on delaying IDC maturation (Lung) [hsI10-DC] (+)

CD8 in the Lung
  1. Max IDC infection/uptake rate in the LN(*) (+) [k12a];

  2. Rate (likelihood) of Naïve CD4+ T cell priming when encountering a MDC (LN)[k14] (*)(+);

  3. Scaling factor between lung and LN compartments [ϒ](+);

  1. IL10 half saturation on delaying IDC maturation (Lung) [hsI10-DC] (+)

Important mechanisms affecting priming (CD4s and CD8+ Ts) that resulted uniquely significant (p<0.001) for either high or low dose LHS experiments. Only either PRCCs>0.15 or PRCCs<-0.15 are shown. The sign of the correlation is in parenthesis.

(*)

significant only in the first 10 days post infection.