Table 2.
Clinical data regarding the use of magnesium therapy in CVS.
| Author/ date |
Study type |
Mg2+ administration type |
N treatment/ placebo |
Major results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mees et al., 2012 [40] | RCT | 64 mMol/day (IV) of MgSO4 for 20 days | 606/597 | Outcomes assessed by the modified Rankin Scale were similar in the treatment and placebo groups. |
|
| ||||
| Wong et al., 2010 [41] | RCT | 20 mMol bolus followed by 80 mMol/day (IV) for 14 days | 169/158 | (i) Outcome measured by GOS was the same at six months after treatment (ii) Incidence of CVS was similar in both groups |
|
| ||||
| Westermaieret al., 2010 [42] | RCT |
16 mMol bolus of MgSO4 followed by 8 mMol/hour continuous infusion for 10 days | 55/55 | (i) Lower incidence of CVS in Mg2+ group (ii) Lower incidence of delayed ischemic infarction in Mg2+ group (iii) DIND nonsignificantly reduced in Mg2+ group, though fewer patients with DIND expressed delayed ischemic infarction |
|
| ||||
| Shah et al., 2009 [43] | Retrospective case series | 8–32 mMol (IA) via super-select catheterization | 14 | (i) No long-term outcomes reported (ii) No cerebral infarction in 12/14 patients |
|
| ||||
| Mori et al., 2009 [44] | Prospective case series | 15 mMol/L MgSO4 at 20 mL/hour (intracisternal) for 20 days | 10 | (i) Five patients had good recovery (ii) One patient exhibited moderate disability (iii) One patient exhibited severe disability (iv) Two patients progressed to a vegetative state (v) One patient died |
|
| ||||
| Muroi et al., 2008 [45] | RCT | 16 mMol bolus in 150 mL followed by 64 mMol continuous infusion for 12 days | 31/27 | (i) Magnesium treatment had to be discontinued in 52% of patients due to adverse side effects (ii) Trend towards improved outcome observed |
|
| ||||
| Dorhout Mees et al., 2007 [21] | Retrospective case series | 64 mMol/day for 20 days | 155/194 | (i) Risk of DCI was lower in patients with higher serum magnesium concentrations when compared to the lowest quartile (ii) No effect on incidence of poor outcome |
|
| ||||
| Schmid-Elsaesser et al., 2006 [46] | RCT | 10 mg/kg bolus followed by 30 mg/kg (IV) infusion of MgSO4 for 7 days | 53/51 | (i) No difference in outcome measured by GOS after 12 months (ii) Similar incidence of CVS in both groups (iii) Rate of cerebral infarction similar in both groups. |
|
| ||||
| Wong et al., (2006) [47] | RCT | 20 mMol bolus followed by 80 mMol/day (IV) for 14 days | 30/30 | (i) CVS incidence decreased, but not statistically significant (ii) Vasospasm detected via TCD shorter in duration (iii) No difference in outcome measured by GOS at 6 months |
|
| ||||
| Prevedello et al., 2006 [48] | RCT | 20 mMol bolus of MgSO4 followed by 120–150 mMol/day | 48 treated with nimodipine, Triple-H therapy, bed rest/ 24 treated with MgSO4 adjunct |
(i) Incidence of vasospasm was reported to be equal in both groups. (ii) Vasospasm occurring in the nimodipine-only group was correlated with longer hospital stays, when compared to the MgSO4 adjunct group |
|
| ||||
| Stippler et al., 2006 [49] | Retrospective historically controlled. |
100 mMol MgSO4/day continuous infusion | 38/38 | (i) Incidence of vasospasm in the Mg2+ adjunct group decreased by 18% (ii) Outcome not changed in Mg2+ group (P > 0.05) |
|
| ||||
| Yahia et al., (2005) [50] | Prospective pilot study | 100 mMol/hour MgSO4 for 10 days | 19 | (i) No adverse effects from continuous magnesium infusion (ii) Lower incidence of both angiographic and clinical CVS observed than the literature values |
|
| ||||
| van den Bergh, 2005 [51] | RCT | 64 mMol (IV) MgSO4 for 14 days | 139/144 | Suggested benefit for reduction of DCI, though results were inconclusive |
|
| ||||
| Venya et al., 2002 [52] | RCT | 6 g bolus followed by 2 g/hour MgSO4 for 10 days | 20/20 | (i) No significant reduction in incidence of CVS (ii) Trend toward improved neurological outcome measured by GOS at 3 months |
|
| ||||
| Chia et al., 2002 [53] | Retrospective case series |
24–52 mMol/day continuous infusion MgSO4 | 13/10 | (i) Significant reduction in the incidence of CVS (ii) Neurologic outcome was similar in both groups |
|
| ||||
| Wong et al., 2011 [54] | Meta-analysis | — | 441 | (i) Lowered odds ratio for incidence of CVS and DCI in the magnesium treatment groups (ii) Increased odds ratio for favorable outcomes |
|
| ||||
| Wong et al., 2010 [41] | Meta-analysis | — | 875 | (i) No benefit from magnesium infusion on the incidence of cerebral infarction (ii) Nonsignificant increase for odds ratio of favorable outcome at 3 and 6 months. |
|
| ||||
| Chen and Carter, 2011 [55] | Meta-analysis | — | 936 | (i) Decreased risk of poor outcome at 3–6 months in the magnesium treatment groups (ii) Risk of mortality after SAH was unaffected |
|
| ||||
| Ma et al., 2010 [22] | Meta-analysis | — | 699 | (i) Magnesium infusion reduced the risk for DCI and poor outcome after SAH (ii) Serum levels need to be monitored closely to prevent adverse side effects |