Skip to main content
. 2013 May 21;2013:943914. doi: 10.1155/2013/943914

Table 2.

Clinical data regarding the use of magnesium therapy in CVS.

Author/
date
Study
type
Mg2+ administration
type
N treatment/
placebo
Major results
Mees et al., 2012 [40] RCT 64 mMol/day (IV) of MgSO4 for 20 days 606/597 Outcomes assessed by the modified Rankin Scale were similar in the treatment and placebo groups.

Wong et al., 2010 [41] RCT 20 mMol bolus followed by 80 mMol/day (IV) for 14 days 169/158 (i) Outcome measured by GOS was the same at six months after treatment
(ii) Incidence of CVS was similar in both groups

Westermaieret al., 2010 [42] RCT
16 mMol bolus of MgSO4   followed by  8 mMol/hour continuous infusion for 10 days 55/55 (i) Lower incidence of CVS in Mg2+ group
(ii) Lower incidence of delayed ischemic infarction in Mg2+ group
(iii) DIND nonsignificantly reduced in Mg2+ group, though fewer patients with DIND expressed delayed ischemic infarction

Shah et al., 2009 [43] Retrospective case series 8–32 mMol (IA) via super-select catheterization 14 (i) No long-term outcomes reported
(ii) No cerebral infarction in 12/14 patients

Mori et al., 2009 [44] Prospective case series 15 mMol/L MgSO4 at 20 mL/hour (intracisternal) for 20 days 10 (i) Five patients had good recovery
(ii) One patient exhibited moderate disability
(iii) One patient exhibited severe disability
(iv) Two patients progressed to a vegetative state
(v) One patient died

Muroi et al., 2008 [45] RCT 16 mMol bolus in 150 mL  followed by 64 mMol continuous infusion for 12 days 31/27 (i) Magnesium treatment had to be discontinued in 52% of patients due to adverse side effects
(ii) Trend towards improved outcome observed

Dorhout Mees et al., 2007 [21] Retrospective case series 64 mMol/day for 20 days 155/194 (i) Risk of DCI was lower in patients with higher serum magnesium concentrations when compared to the lowest quartile
(ii) No effect on incidence of poor outcome

Schmid-Elsaesser et al., 2006 [46] RCT 10 mg/kg bolus  followed by 30 mg/kg (IV) infusion of MgSO4 for 7 days 53/51 (i) No difference in outcome measured by GOS after 12 months
(ii) Similar incidence of CVS in both groups
(iii) Rate of cerebral infarction similar in both groups.

Wong et al., (2006) [47] RCT 20 mMol bolus  followed by  80 mMol/day (IV) for 14 days 30/30 (i) CVS incidence decreased, but not statistically significant
(ii) Vasospasm detected via TCD shorter in duration
(iii) No difference in outcome measured by GOS at 6 months

Prevedello et al., 2006 [48] RCT 20 mMol bolus of MgSO4   followed by  120–150 mMol/day 48 treated with nimodipine, Triple-H therapy, bed rest/
24 treated with MgSO4 adjunct
(i) Incidence of vasospasm was reported to be equal in both groups.
(ii) Vasospasm occurring in the nimodipine-only group was correlated with longer hospital stays, when compared to the MgSO4 adjunct group

Stippler et al., 2006 [49] Retrospective
historically controlled.
100 mMol MgSO4/day continuous infusion 38/38 (i) Incidence of vasospasm in the Mg2+ adjunct group decreased by 18%
(ii) Outcome not changed in Mg2+ group (P > 0.05)

Yahia et al., (2005) [50] Prospective pilot study 100 mMol/hour MgSO4 for 10 days 19 (i) No adverse effects from continuous magnesium infusion
(ii) Lower incidence of both angiographic and clinical CVS observed than the literature values

van den Bergh, 2005 [51] RCT 64 mMol (IV) MgSO4 for 14 days 139/144 Suggested benefit for reduction of DCI, though results were inconclusive

Venya et al., 2002 [52] RCT 6 g bolus followed by  2 g/hour MgSO4 for 10 days 20/20 (i) No significant reduction in incidence of CVS
(ii) Trend toward improved neurological outcome measured by GOS at 3 months

Chia et al., 2002 [53] Retrospective
case series
24–52 mMol/day continuous infusion MgSO4 13/10 (i) Significant reduction in the incidence of CVS
(ii) Neurologic outcome was similar in both groups

Wong et al., 2011 [54] Meta-analysis 441 (i) Lowered odds ratio for incidence of CVS and DCI in the magnesium treatment groups
(ii) Increased odds ratio for favorable outcomes

Wong et al., 2010 [41] Meta-analysis 875 (i) No benefit from magnesium infusion on the incidence of cerebral infarction
(ii) Nonsignificant increase for odds ratio of favorable outcome at 3 and 6 months.

Chen and Carter, 2011 [55] Meta-analysis 936 (i) Decreased risk of poor outcome at 3–6 months in the magnesium treatment groups
(ii) Risk of mortality after SAH was unaffected

Ma et al., 2010 [22] Meta-analysis 699 (i) Magnesium infusion reduced the risk for DCI and poor outcome after SAH
(ii) Serum levels need to be monitored closely to prevent adverse side effects