Table 4.
Children's Exposure to Beverage Advertisements, by Age, by Beverage Type, by Year
| 2003 | 2005 | 2007 | 2009 | % Change 2007–2009 | % Change 2003–2009 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Children Aged 2–5 Years | High Sugar Beverage Ads | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | −30.7% | −55.2% |
| Regular Soft Drinks | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0% | −67.9% | |
| Fruit Drinks | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | +111.1% | −51.3% | |
| Bottled Water (Sugar Added) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | −50.0% | +500.0% | |
| Drinks - Isotonic | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | −50.0% | −61.5% | |
| Other High Sugar Beverage | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | −62.9% | −63.9% | |
|
| |||||||
| Low Sugar Beverage Ads | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | +19.2% | 63.2% | |
| Diet Soft Drinks | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | −40.0% | 0.0% | |
| Fruit Juices (100%) | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | +10.0% | +10.0% | |
| Bottled Water | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Milk (Unfavored) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +50.0% | 0.0% | |
| Other Low Sugar Beverage | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | +57.1% | +120.0% | |
|
| |||||||
| Children Aged 6–11 Years | High Sugar Beverage Ads | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.6 | −28.4% | −53.0% |
| Regular Soft Drinks | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | +9.1% | −67.6% | |
| Fruit Drinks | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | +118.2% | −42.9% | |
| Bottled Water (Sugar Added) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | −53.3% | +600.0% | |
| Drinks - Isotonic | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | −53.8% | −60.0% | |
| Other High Sugar Beverage | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | −59.5% | −60.5% | |
|
| |||||||
| Low Sugar Beverage Ads | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | +25.0% | +52.2% | |
| Diet Soft Drinks | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | −33.3% | +33.3% | |
| Fruit Juices (100%) | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | +20.0% | 0.0% | |
| Bottled Water | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Milk (Unfavored) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +100.0% | 0.0% | |
| Other Low Sugar Beverage | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | +62.5% | +160.0% | |
@ The Nielsen Company 2009.
Note: % Change calculations were based on two decimal points.