Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 27;33(9):4076–4093. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1659-12.2013

Table 2.

Principal component analysis of increased and decreased activity

Cumulative variance (%) pc variance Response pc1 pc2 pc3 pc4
pc1 44.21030281 0.1629294 Supragranular Increased 0.192969 0.4848809 −0.312331 0.0005789
pc2 71.03246885 0.0988484 Decreased 0.4076718 −0.205153 0.1687933 −0.0543012
pc3 92.99443819 0.080937 Granular Increased 0.166108 0.2601034 −0.3648693 −0.0260106
pc4 96.89447643 0.0143729 Decreased 0.3399926 0.2139566 0.2859596 −0.5156428
pc5 98.60621637 0.0063083 Infragranular Increased 0.0512769 0.4105422 −0.0402117 −0.1843402
pc6 99.61462124 0.0037163 Decreased 0.4235365 −0.2734356 −0.2119353 −0.3806003
pc7 99.83804586 0.0008234 M1 Increased 0.084304 0.1439821 −0.1092586 0.3450707
pc8 99.94689553 0.0004011 Decreased 0.3603517 −0.0147926 0.0682632 0.2510888
pc9 99.9710496 8.90E-05 VPM Increased 0.1967974 0.2950371 −0.2542239 0.0260476
pc10 99.98996768 6.97E-05 Decreased 0.1489934 0.3088844 0.7176482 0.0854539
pc11 99.99776799 2.87E-05 POM Increased −0.1273602 0.3553321 0.1261817 0.2783481
pc12 100 8.23E-06 Decreased 0.5072061 −0.1907687 −0.0188202 0.5329833

Analysis of significant increased and decreased responses across all areas studied showed that two principal components (pcs) were able to explain a large portion of the sample's variance. The first component included mostly decreased activity from all S1 layers, M1, and POM, and increased activity in VPM. The second component included increased activity in all S1 layers, VPM, and POM, and decreased activity in VPM and all S1 layers. The presence of such a large portion of variance explained solely by two components indicates that common concurrent patterns of increased and decreased activity occur at all times in the TCLs, suggesting a distributed mode of processing during active tactile discrimination.