Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009 Dec 17;34(3):509–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01116.x

Table 3.

Immediate and Residual effects of Heavy Drinking on Measures of Subjective Ratings of Hangover and Neurocognitive Performance: Main Effects for Alcohol vs. Placebo and Significant Interactions

Measure After alcohol M (SD) After placebo M (SD) F df ff
At peak BrAC
Ability to drive vehicle a 1.52 (0.58) 2.86 (0.35) 390.66*** 1,91 2.00
Likely to drive vehicle b 1.55 (0.95) 4.09 (1.09) 366.68*** 1,92 2.00
Next morning
Ability to drive vehicle a 3.60 (0.55) 3.12 (0.51) 51.89*** 1,91 0.75
Likely to drive vehicle b 3.46 (1.22) 4.25 (0.88) 49.72*** 1,92 0.73
Acute Hangover Scale 1.60 (0.90) 0.60 (0.46) 130.19*** 1,91 1.20
 Vodka condition 1.38 (0.74) 0.57 (0.32) 5.69c* 1,91 .25c
 Bourbon condition 1.88 (1.01) 0.64 (0.59)
Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) d 3.37 (1.22) 2.61 (1.12) 29.81*** 1,92 .57
Sleep quality mean score e 2.98 (0.64) 3.46 (0.53) 45.97*** 1,88 .72
*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

p < .001.

a

Rated from 1 “much worse” to 5 “much better”

b

Rated from 1 “definitely would not” to 5 “definitely would”

c

Test of interaction of alcohol and congener content

d

High score (7) is extremely sleepy

e

High score is “much better” or “excellent”

f

Effect size: < .25 is small, .25–.39 is medium, ≥ .40 is large